Xbox One S GPU vs GeForce PCX 5750

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1458not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.13no data
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameNV39Durango 2
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date17 February 2004 (20 years ago)2 August 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$399

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data768
Core clock speed425 MHz914 MHz
Number of transistors82 million5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt95 Watt
Texture fill rate1.70043.87
Floating-point processing powerno data1.404 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs448

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16IGP
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRDDR3
Maximum RAM amount128 MB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed275 MHz1066 MHz
Memory bandwidth8.8 GB/s68.22 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0a12 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGL1.5 (2.1)N/A
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 February 2004 2 August 2016
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 95 Watt

PCX 5750 has 90% lower power consumption.

Xbox One S GPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 712.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce PCX 5750 and Xbox One S GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce PCX 5750 is a desktop card while Xbox One S GPU is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce PCX 5750
GeForce PCX 5750
AMD Xbox One S GPU
Xbox One S GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 4 votes

Rate GeForce PCX 5750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 174 votes

Rate Xbox One S GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.