Radeon RX 7700 XT vs GeForce MX570

Place in the ranking	354	39
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	70.51
Power efficiency	41.03	16.46
Architecture	Ampere (2020−2024)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code name	GA107	Navi 32
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	May 2022 (2 years ago)	25 August 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	3456
Core clock speed	832 MHz	1435 MHz
Boost clock speed	1155 MHz	2544 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	25 Watt	245 Watt
Texture fill rate	73.92	549.5
Floating-point processing power	4.731 TFLOPS	35.17 TFLOPS
ROPs	40	96
TMUs	64	216
Tensor Cores	64	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	16	54

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	12 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	96 GB/s	432.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.6	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	2.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
CUDA	8.6	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce MX570 14.90

RX 7700 XT 58.57
+293%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce MX570 5729

RX 7700 XT 22515
+293%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	41 −359%	188 +359%
1440p	24−27 −329%	103 +329%
4K	14−16 −329%	60 +329%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	2.39
1440p	no data	4.36
4K	no data	7.48

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	24−27 −577%	176 +577%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 −566%	193 +566%
Elden Ring	45−50 −327%	192 +327%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 −144%	110−120 +144%
Counter-Strike 2	24−27 −458%	145 +458%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 −172%	79 +172%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 −552%	398 +552%
Metro Exodus	40−45 −283%	157 +283%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 −197%	100−110 +197%
Valorant	55−60 −341%	260−270 +341%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 −144%	110−120 +144%
Counter-Strike 2	24−27 −365%	121 +365%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 −128%	66 +128%
Dota 2	12 −1283%	166 +1283%
Elden Ring	45−50 −387%	210−220 +387%
Far Cry 5	68 −47.1%	100 +47.1%
Fortnite	80−85 −177%	230−240 +177%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 −448%	334 +448%
Grand Theft Auto V	50−55 −213%	166 +213%
Metro Exodus	40−45 −222%	132 +222%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	100−110 −101%	210−220 +101%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 −197%	100−110 +197%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 −287%	170−180 +287%
Valorant	55−60 −341%	260−270 +341%
World of Tanks	190−200 −44.6%	270−280 +44.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 −144%	110−120 +144%
Counter-Strike 2	24−27 −323%	110 +323%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 −110%	61 +110%
Dota 2	50−55 −289%	210−220 +289%
Far Cry 5	55−60 −113%	110−120 +113%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 −370%	287 +370%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	100−110 −101%	210−220 +101%
Valorant	55−60 −341%	260−270 +341%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	21−24 −400%	105 +400%
Elden Ring	21−24 −513%	140−150 +513%
Grand Theft Auto V	21−24 −377%	105 +377%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	130−140 −32.6%	170−180 +32.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 −415%	65−70 +415%
World of Tanks	100−110 −269%	350−400 +269%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	30−33 −190%	85−90 +190%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −462%	73 +462%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 −264%	40 +264%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −344%	160−170 +344%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −436%	193 +436%
Metro Exodus	30−35 −319%	134 +319%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 −532%	120 +532%
Valorant	35−40 −511%	220−230 +511%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −210%	31 +210%
Dota 2	24−27 −331%	112 +331%
Elden Ring	10−11 −620%	70−75 +620%
Grand Theft Auto V	24−27 −331%	112 +331%
Metro Exodus	10−11 −470%	57 +470%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	40−45 −370%	200−210 +370%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 −340%	40−45 +340%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 −331%	112 +331%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 −429%	70−75 +429%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −580%	65−70 +580%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −350%	18 +350%
Dota 2	24−27 −285%	100−105 +285%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −453%	100−110 +453%
Fortnite	16−18 −465%	95−100 +465%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −362%	97 +362%
Valorant	16−18 −694%	120−130 +694%

This is how GeForce MX570 and RX 7700 XT compete in popular games:

RX 7700 XT is 359% faster in 1080p
RX 7700 XT is 329% faster in 1440p
RX 7700 XT is 329% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 7700 XT is 1283% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, RX 7700 XT surpassed GeForce MX570 in all 61 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	14.90	58.57
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	12 GB
Chip lithography	8 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	25 Watt	245 Watt

GeForce MX570 has 880% lower power consumption.

RX 7700 XT, on the other hand, has a 293.1% higher aggregate performance score, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 60% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7700 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce MX570 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce MX570 is a notebook card while Radeon RX 7700 XT is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.