Radeon Picasso Embedded vs GeForce MX570 A

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking343not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency43.13no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGA107Picasso
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release dateMay 2022 (2 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048192
Core clock speed832 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1155 MHz1301 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,940 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt10 Watt
Texture fill rate73.9215.61
Floating-point processing power4.731 TFLOPS0.4996 TFLOPS
ROPs404
TMUs6412
Tensor Cores64no data
Ray Tracing Cores16no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8IGP
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1500 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth96 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.6no data
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3-
CUDA8.6-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 8 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 10 Watt

MX570 A has a 75% more advanced lithography process.

Picasso Embedded, on the other hand, has 150% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce MX570 A and Radeon Picasso Embedded. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce MX570 A is a notebook card while Radeon Picasso Embedded is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A
GeForce MX570 A
AMD Radeon Picasso Embedded
Radeon Picasso Embedded

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 54 votes

Rate GeForce MX570 A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon Picasso Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.