Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS vs GeForce MX570 A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
MX570 A RTX 2050 Max-Q RTX 2050 Mobile RTX 3050 Mobile
VS
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 2.1 TFLOPS Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce MX570 A and Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

MX570 A
2022
2 GB GDDR6, 25 Watt
16.00
+127%

MX570 A outperforms Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS by a whopping 127% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

MX570 A MX570 A
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking339555
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency44.0624.23
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)no data
GPU code nameGA107no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release dateMay 2022 (2 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048768
Core clock speed832 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1155 MHzno data
Manufacturing process technology8 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate73.92no data
Floating-point processing power4.731 TFLOPSno data
ROPs40no data
TMUs64no data
Tensor Cores64no data
Ray Tracing Cores16no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6LPDDR5x
Maximum RAM amount2 GBno data
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz8448 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12_1
Shader Model6.6no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3-
CUDA8.6-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD45−50
+125%
20
−125%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 15
+0%
15
+0%
Elden Ring 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 11
+0%
11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30
+0%
30
+0%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Valorant 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10
+0%
10
+0%
Dota 2 24
+0%
24
+0%
Elden Ring 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 23
+0%
23
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 24
+0%
24
+0%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Valorant 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
World of Tanks 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 8
+0%
8
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 19
+0%
19
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Valorant 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Elden Ring 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
World of Tanks 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Elden Ring 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Fortnite 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

This is how MX570 A and Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS compete in popular games:

  • MX570 A is 125% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 54 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 16.00 7.04
Chip lithography 8 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 20 Watt

MX570 A has a 127.3% higher aggregate performance score.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, on the other hand, has a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.

The GeForce MX570 A is our recommended choice as it beats the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A
GeForce MX570 A
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

MX570 A GeForce MX570 A
vs
HD 7970M Crossfire Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
vs
GeForce MX350 GeForce MX350
MX570 A GeForce MX570 A
vs
GTX 1650 Max-Q GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Graphics (Ryzen 7000) Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
vs
Iris Plus Graphics 940 Iris Plus Graphics 940
Graphics (Ryzen 7000) Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
vs
Iris Plus Graphics 950 Iris Plus Graphics 950
Graphics (Ryzen 7000) Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
vs
Iris Plus Graphics 930 Iris Plus Graphics 930
RX 7900 XTX Radeon RX 7900 XTX
vs
Arc Graphics 130V Arc Graphics 130V
MX570 A GeForce MX570 A
vs
Tesla S1070 Tesla S1070
RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh
vs
GTX 1080 Ti 12 GB GTX 1080 Ti 12 GB
RTX 3060 12 GB GA104 GeForce RTX 3060 12 GB GA104
vs
Data Center GPU Flex 140 Data Center GPU Flex 140
P4200 Max-Q Quadro P4200 Max-Q
vs
K3000M Quadro K3000M
Radeon 760M Radeon 760M
vs
Iris Plus Graphics G7 64EU Mobile Iris Plus Graphics G7 64EU Mobile
Radeon 780M Radeon 780M
vs
520 Mobile DDR3 Radeon 520 Mobile DDR3

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 58 votes

Rate GeForce MX570 A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.