Quadro K1200 vs GeForce MX570 A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce MX570 A with Quadro K1200, including specs and performance data.

MX570 A
2022
2 GB GDDR6, 25 Watt
15.71
+106%

MX570 A outperforms K1200 by a whopping 106% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking343527
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.69
Power efficiency43.0611.63
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameGA107GM107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release dateMay 2022 (2 years ago)28 January 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$321.97

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048512
Core clock speed832 MHz1058 MHz
Boost clock speed1155 MHz1124 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate73.9235.97
Floating-point processing power4.731 TFLOPS1.151 TFLOPS
ROPs4016
TMUs6432
Tensor Cores64no data
Ray Tracing Cores16no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data160 mm
Widthno data1" (2.5 cm)
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6128 Bit
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/sUp to 80 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort
Number of simultaneous displaysno data4

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision Prono data+
Mosaicno data+
nView Desktop Managementno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12
Shader Model6.65.1
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL3.01.2
Vulkan1.31.1.126
CUDA8.65.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

MX570 A 15.71
+106%
Quadro K1200 7.64

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

MX570 A 6054
+106%
Quadro K1200 2943

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.71 7.64
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 45 Watt

MX570 A has a 105.6% higher aggregate performance score, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 80% lower power consumption.

Quadro K1200, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The GeForce MX570 A is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K1200 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce MX570 A is a notebook card while Quadro K1200 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A
GeForce MX570 A
NVIDIA Quadro K1200
Quadro K1200

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 57 votes

Rate GeForce MX570 A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 102 votes

Rate Quadro K1200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.