GeForce GTX 765M vs MX570 A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
MX570 MX570 A RTX 2050 Max-Q RTX 2050 Mobile RTX 3050 Max-Q RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 4 GB RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 6 GB RTX 3050 Mobile RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 4 GB RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 6 GB RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 760A GTX 760M GTX 765M GTX 765M SLI

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce MX570 A and GeForce GTX 765M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

MX570 A
2022
2 GB GDDR6, 25 Watt
16.05
+207%

MX570 A outperforms GTX 765M by a whopping 207% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

MX570 A MX570 A
GTX 765M GTX 765M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking346630
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency44.014.78
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameGA107GK106
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release dateMay 2022 (2 years ago)30 May 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048768
Core clock speed832 MHz850 MHz
Boost clock speed1155 MHz863 MHz
Number of transistorsno data2,540 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate73.9255.23
Floating-point processing power4.731 TFLOPS1.326 TFLOPS
ROPs4016
TMUs6464
Tensor Cores64no data
Ray Tracing Cores16no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportno dataPCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Standard memory configurationno dataGDDR5
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s64.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
eDP 1.2 signal supportno dataUp to 3840x2160
LVDS signal supportno dataUp to 1920x1200
VGA аnalog display supportno dataUp to 2048x1536
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportno dataUp to 3840x2160
HDMI-+
HDCP content protection-+
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI-+
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support-+
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder-+
Optimus-+
3D Vision / 3DTV Play-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 API
Shader Model6.65.1
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL3.01.1
Vulkan1.31.1.126
CUDA8.6+
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

MX570 A 16.05
+207%
GTX 765M 5.23

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

MX570 A 6168
+207%
GTX 765M 2009

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p150−160
+194%
51
−194%
Full HD120−130
+200%
40
−200%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Battlefield 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Fortnite 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Valorant 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Battlefield 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 107
+0%
107
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Dota 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Fortnite 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Dota 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

This is how MX570 A and GTX 765M compete in popular games:

  • MX570 A is 194% faster in 900p
  • MX570 A is 200% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 16.05 5.23
Chip lithography 8 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 75 Watt

MX570 A has a 206.9% higher aggregate performance score, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

The GeForce MX570 A is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 765M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A
GeForce MX570 A
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
GeForce GTX 765M
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

MX570 A GeForce MX570 A
vs
HD 7970M Crossfire Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire
GTX 765M GeForce GTX 765M
vs
R9 M385X Radeon R9 M385X
MX570 A GeForce MX570 A
vs
GTX 1650 Max-Q GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
RTX 3070 16 GB NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 16 GB
vs
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile
Apple M1 8-Core GPU Apple M1 8 Core GPU
vs
R7 260 R7 260
Apple M1 7-Core GPU Apple M1 7 Core GPU
vs
RTX 2050 Max-Q RTX 2050 Max-Q
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)
vs
UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 32 EU)
Graphics (Ryzen 7000) AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
vs
GeForce 830M GeForce 830M
RTX 3060 12 GB GA104 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 12 GB GA104
vs
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 5000 Ada Generation NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation
vs
Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU Max 40-Core GPU
RX 6600 LE AMD RX 6600 LE
vs
RX 6750 GRE 10 GB RX 6750 GRE 10 GB
GTX 1080 SLI Mobile NVIDIA GTX 1080 SLI Mobile
vs
GTX 950 950
GTX 980M NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
vs
RX Vega 5 RX Vega 5

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 58 votes

Rate GeForce MX570 A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 76 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 765M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce MX570 A or GeForce GTX 765M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.