CMP 50HX vs GeForce MX570 A

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking343not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency43.19no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGA107TU102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release dateMay 2022 (2 years ago)24 June 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20483584
Core clock speed832 MHz1350 MHz
Boost clock speed1155 MHz1545 MHz
Number of transistorsno data18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate73.92296.6
Floating-point processing power4.731 TFLOPS11.07 TFLOPS
ROPs4080
TMUs64192
Tensor Cores64448
Ray Tracing Cores1656

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB10 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s560.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.2
CUDA8.67.5

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 10 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 250 Watt

MX570 A has a 50% more advanced lithography process, and 900% lower power consumption.

CMP 50HX, on the other hand, has a 400% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between GeForce MX570 A and CMP 50HX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce MX570 A is a notebook card while CMP 50HX is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A
GeForce MX570 A
NVIDIA CMP 50HX
CMP 50HX

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 52 votes

Rate GeForce MX570 A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 43 votes

Rate CMP 50HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.