Arc A310 vs GeForce MX570 A

Place in performance ranking	322	288
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Architecture	Ampere (2020−2022)	Xe HPG (2020−2022)
GPU code name	GA107	Alchemist
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	May 2022 (2 years ago)	1 September 2022 (1 year ago)
Current price	$1574	no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	6
Boost clock speed	1155 MHz	2000 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	25 Watt	75 Watt (40 - 75 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	73.92	64.00

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce MX570 A and Arc A310 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x8
Width	IGP	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	12 GB/s	15500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	96 GB/s	124.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.6	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
CUDA	8.6	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

MX570 A 15.47

Arc A310 17.92
+15.8%

Arc A310 outperforms GeForce MX570 A by 16% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

MX570 A 5975
+7.1%

Arc A310 5577

GeForce MX570 A outperforms Arc A310 by 7% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

30−35

−16.7%

35
+16.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−33 −16.7%	35−40 +16.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27 −25%	30−33 +25%
Battlefield 5	50−55 −18%	55−60 +18%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−33 −20%	35−40 +20%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −20%	40−45 +20%
Far Cry New Dawn	40−45 −20%	45−50 +20%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 −18.6%	80−85 +18.6%
Hitman 3	30−33 −16.7%	35−40 +16.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 −18.3%	70−75 +18.3%
Metro Exodus	50−55 −20%	60−65 +20%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 −22.5%	45−50 +22.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	65−70 −23.1%	80 +23.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 −24.4%	55−60 +24.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−33 −16.7%	35−40 +16.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27 −25%	30−33 +25%
Battlefield 5	50−55 −18%	55−60 +18%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−33 −20%	35−40 +20%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −20%	40−45 +20%
Far Cry New Dawn	40−45 −20%	45−50 +20%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 −18.6%	80−85 +18.6%
Hitman 3	30−33 −16.7%	35−40 +16.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 −18.3%	70−75 +18.3%
Metro Exodus	50−55 −20%	60−65 +20%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 −22.5%	45−50 +22.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	55−60 −18.2%	65 +18.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 −24.4%	56 +24.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 −24.4%	55−60 +24.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−33 −16.7%	35−40 +16.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27 −25%	30−33 +25%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−33 −20%	35−40 +20%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −20%	40−45 +20%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 −18.6%	80−85 +18.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 −18.3%	70−75 +18.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 −20%	54 +20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 −20.8%	29 +20.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 −24.4%	55−60 +24.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

40−45

−22.5%

45−50
+22.5%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 −25.9%	30−35 +25.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−33 −16.7%	35−40 +16.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 −28.6%	18−20 +28.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 −33.3%	16−18 +33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 −27.8%	21−24 +27.8%
Far Cry 5	24−27 −25%	30−33 +25%
Forza Horizon 4	30−33 −16.7%	35−40 +16.7%
Hitman 3	18−20 −16.7%	21−24 +16.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33 −20%	35−40 +20%
Metro Exodus	27−30 −22.2%	30−35 +22.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−33 −16.7%	35−40 +16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −25%	20−22 +25%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−11 −20%	12−14 +20%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

24−27

−20.8%

27−30
+20.8%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 −28.6%	18−20 +28.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−11 −30%	12−14 +30%
Hitman 3	10−11 −30%	12−14 +30%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 −25%	20−22 +25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 −22.2%	10−12 +22.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −28.6%	18−20 +28.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 −25%	10−11 +25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7−8 −28.6%	9−10 +28.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 −28.6%	9−10 +28.6%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −25%	10−11 +25%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −33.3%	24−27 +33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 −25%	20−22 +25%
Metro Exodus	14−16 −21.4%	16−18 +21.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	6−7 −16.7%	7−8 +16.7%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

12−14

−33.3%

16−18
+33.3%

This is how MX570 A and Arc A310 compete in popular games:

Arc A310 is 17% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	15.47	17.92
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	8 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	25 Watt	75 Watt

MX570 A has 200% lower power consumption.

Arc A310, on the other hand, has a 15.8% higher aggregate performance score, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 33.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc A310 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce MX570 A in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce MX570 A is a desktop card while Arc A310 is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.