XGI Volari Duo V8 Ultra vs GeForce MX450

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking457not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency26.76no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)XG4 (2003−2005)
GPU code nameN17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1XG40
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 August 2020 (4 years ago)15 September 2003 (21 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores896no data
Core clock speed1395 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed1575 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,700 million110 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt (12 - 29 Watt TGP)no data
Texture fill rate100.82.800
Floating-point processing power3.226 TFLOPSno data
ROPs324
TMUs648

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4AGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5, GDDR6DDR2
Maximum RAM amount2 GB256 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed10000 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth64.03 GB/s32 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.61.5
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2N/A
CUDA7.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 August 2020 15 September 2003
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 12 nm 130 nm

GeForce MX450 has an age advantage of 16 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 983.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce MX450 and XGI Volari Duo V8 Ultra. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce MX450 is a notebook card while XGI Volari Duo V8 Ultra is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX450
GeForce MX450
XGI Volari Duo V8 Ultra
Volari Duo V8 Ultra

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 1301 vote

Rate GeForce MX450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 25 votes

Rate XGI Volari Duo V8 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.