Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile vs GeForce MX250

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce MX250 with RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.

GeForce MX250
2019
2 GB GDDR5, 10 Watt
6.24
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
2024
4 GB GDDR6, 35 Watt
27.30
+338%

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms MX250 by a whopping 338% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking579202
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency42.7853.47
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGP108BAD107
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date20 February 2019 (5 years ago)26 February 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3842048
Core clock speed937 MHz1485 MHz
Boost clock speed1038 MHz2025 MHz
Number of transistors1,800 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate24.91129.6
Floating-point processing power0.7972 TFLOPS8.294 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs2464
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth48.06 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)6.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA6.18.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce MX250 6.24
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 27.30
+338%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GeForce MX250 4633
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 20239
+337%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GeForce MX250 16488
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 66297
+302%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GeForce MX250 3660
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 14136
+286%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

GeForce MX250 1103
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 5278
+379%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD22
−332%
95−100
+332%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14
−329%
60−65
+329%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 19
−321%
80−85
+321%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 13
−323%
55−60
+323%
Battlefield 5 21
−329%
90−95
+329%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18
−317%
75−80
+317%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
−309%
45−50
+309%
Far Cry 5 22
−332%
95−100
+332%
Far Cry New Dawn 27
−307%
110−120
+307%
Forza Horizon 4 46
−335%
200−210
+335%
Hitman 3 16
−338%
70−75
+338%
Horizon Zero Dawn 118
−324%
500−550
+324%
Metro Exodus 25
−300%
100−105
+300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 28
−329%
120−130
+329%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35
−329%
150−160
+329%
Watch Dogs: Legion 76
−295%
300−310
+295%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24
−317%
100−105
+317%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−338%
35−40
+338%
Battlefield 5 17
−312%
70−75
+312%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 17
−312%
70−75
+312%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−300%
40−45
+300%
Far Cry 5 19
−321%
80−85
+321%
Far Cry New Dawn 17
−312%
70−75
+312%
Forza Horizon 4 43
−319%
180−190
+319%
Hitman 3 16
−338%
70−75
+338%
Horizon Zero Dawn 115
−335%
500−550
+335%
Metro Exodus 19
−321%
80−85
+321%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16
−338%
70−75
+338%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 22
−332%
95−100
+332%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
−325%
85−90
+325%
Watch Dogs: Legion 71
−323%
300−310
+323%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7
−329%
30−33
+329%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−338%
35−40
+338%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12
−317%
50−55
+317%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−300%
40−45
+300%
Far Cry 5 13
−323%
55−60
+323%
Forza Horizon 4 16
−338%
70−75
+338%
Hitman 3 12−14
−323%
55−60
+323%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16
−338%
70−75
+338%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16
−338%
70−75
+338%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12
−317%
50−55
+317%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−331%
220−230
+331%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18
−317%
75−80
+317%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−317%
50−55
+317%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
−300%
40−45
+300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−300%
24−27
+300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−300%
24−27
+300%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−329%
30−33
+329%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
−325%
85−90
+325%
Hitman 3 10−11
−300%
40−45
+300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−329%
60−65
+329%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−300%
24−27
+300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−325%
170−180
+325%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−309%
45−50
+309%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−300%
16−18
+300%
Hitman 3 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−338%
70−75
+338%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−300%
16−18
+300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−300%
24−27
+300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−329%
30−33
+329%

This is how GeForce MX250 and Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile compete in popular games:

  • Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is 332% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.24 27.30
Recency 20 February 2019 26 February 2024
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 35 Watt

GeForce MX250 has 250% lower power consumption.

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has a 337.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce MX250 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce MX250 is a notebook graphics card while RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX250
GeForce MX250
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 1556 votes

Rate GeForce MX250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 18 votes

Rate RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.