RTX A5000 vs GeForce MX230

Place in the ranking	646	37
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	32.77	17.64
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	GP108	GA102
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	21 February 2019 (5 years ago)	12 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	256	8192
Core clock speed	1519 MHz	1170 MHz
Boost clock speed	1582 MHz	1695 MHz
Number of transistors	1,800 million	28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	230 Watt
Texture fill rate	25.31	433.9
Floating-point processing power	0.81 TFLOPS	27.77 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	96
TMUs	16	256
Tensor Cores	no data	256
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	24 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	1502 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	48.06 GB/s	768.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

4x DisplayPort 1.4a

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	+	8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce MX230 4.76

RTX A5000 58.95
+1138%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce MX230 1831

RTX A5000 22663
+1138%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GeForce MX230 6679

RTX A5000 154973
+2220%

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

GeForce MX230 7113

RTX A5000 138454
+1846%

GeekBench 5 CUDA

GeForce MX230 6604

RTX A5000 190987
+2792%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−1138%

260−270
+1138%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −1067%	140−150 +1067%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 −1100%	120−130 +1100%
Elden Ring	10−12 −1082%	130−140 +1082%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	13 −1131%	160−170 +1131%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −1067%	140−150 +1067%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 −1100%	120−130 +1100%
Forza Horizon 4	20−22 −1100%	240−250 +1100%
Metro Exodus	15 −1100%	180−190 +1100%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −1100%	180−190 +1100%
Valorant	10−12 −1082%	130−140 +1082%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	14 −1114%	170−180 +1114%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −1067%	140−150 +1067%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 −1100%	120−130 +1100%
Dota 2	32 −994%	350−400 +994%
Elden Ring	10−12 −1082%	130−140 +1082%
Far Cry 5	33 −1112%	400−450 +1112%
Fortnite	27−30 −971%	300−310 +971%
Forza Horizon 4	20−22 −1100%	240−250 +1100%
Grand Theft Auto V	19 −1111%	230−240 +1111%
Metro Exodus	9 −1122%	110−120 +1122%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	75 −1100%	900−950 +1100%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −1100%	180−190 +1100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −1088%	190−200 +1088%
Valorant	10−12 −1082%	130−140 +1082%
World of Tanks	65 −1131%	800−850 +1131%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	10 −1100%	120−130 +1100%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −1067%	140−150 +1067%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 −1100%	120−130 +1100%
Dota 2	43 −1063%	500−550 +1063%
Far Cry 5	18 −1122%	220−230 +1122%
Forza Horizon 4	20−22 −1100%	240−250 +1100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	40−45 −1120%	500−550 +1120%
Valorant	10−12 −1082%	130−140 +1082%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	3−4 −1067%	35−40 +1067%
Elden Ring	5−6 −1100%	60−65 +1100%
Grand Theft Auto V	4−5 −1025%	45−50 +1025%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	30−35 −994%	350−400 +994%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −1067%	35−40 +1067%
World of Tanks	30−35 −1076%	400−450 +1076%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	7−8 −1114%	85−90 +1114%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −1122%	110−120 +1122%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −1025%	45−50 +1025%
Far Cry 5	10−11 −1100%	120−130 +1100%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −1067%	70−75 +1067%
Metro Exodus	3−4 −1067%	35−40 +1067%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 −1067%	70−75 +1067%
Valorant	12−14 −1131%	160−170 +1131%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 −1135%	210−220 +1135%
Elden Ring	2−3 −1100%	24−27 +1100%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 −1088%	190−200 +1088%
Metro Exodus	0−1	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	14−16 −1114%	170−180 +1114%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −1067%	35−40 +1067%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −1088%	190−200 +1088%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 −1025%	45−50 +1025%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −1100%	24−27 +1100%
Dota 2	16−18 −1135%	210−220 +1135%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −1100%	60−65 +1100%
Fortnite	4−5 −1025%	45−50 +1025%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −1067%	35−40 +1067%
Valorant	4−5 −1025%	45−50 +1025%

This is how GeForce MX230 and RTX A5000 compete in popular games:

RTX A5000 is 1138% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	4.76	58.95
Recency	21 February 2019	12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	24 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	230 Watt

GeForce MX230 has 2200% lower power consumption.

RTX A5000, on the other hand, has a 1138.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A5000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce MX230 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce MX230 is a notebook card while RTX A5000 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.