Radeon Pro 5300M vs GeForce MX150

Place in the ranking	592	346
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	40.61	12.62
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code name	GP108	Navi 14
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	17 May 2017 (7 years ago)	13 November 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	1280
Core clock speed	937 MHz	1000 MHz
Boost clock speed	1038 MHz	1250 MHz
Number of transistors	1,800 million	6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	85 Watt
Texture fill rate	24.91	100.0
Floating-point processing power	0.7972 TFLOPS	3.2 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	32
TMUs	24	80

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1253 MHz	1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	40.1 GB/s	192.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	6.1	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce MX150 5.90

Pro 5300M 15.58
+164%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce MX150 2270

Pro 5300M 5989
+164%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	26 −150%	65−70 +150%
1440p	28 −150%	70−75 +150%
4K	20 −150%	50−55 +150%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −108%	27−30 +108%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −158%	30−35 +158%
Elden Ring	14−16 −220%	45−50 +220%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	15 −240%	50−55 +240%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −108%	27−30 +108%
Cyberpunk 2077	9 −244%	30−35 +244%
Forza Horizon 4	27 −137%	60−65 +137%
Metro Exodus	18 −133%	40−45 +133%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27 −40.7%	35−40 +40.7%
Valorant	24 −158%	60−65 +158%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	21 −143%	50−55 +143%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −108%	27−30 +108%
Cyberpunk 2077	3 −933%	30−35 +933%
Dota 2	40 −40%	55−60 +40%
Elden Ring	13 −269%	45−50 +269%
Far Cry 5	42 −33.3%	55−60 +33.3%
Fortnite	29 −197%	85−90 +197%
Forza Horizon 4	21 −205%	60−65 +205%
Grand Theft Auto V	26 −115%	55−60 +115%
Metro Exodus	11 −282%	40−45 +282%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	56 −98.2%	110−120 +98.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 −124%	35−40 +124%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	22 −118%	45−50 +118%
Valorant	17 −265%	60−65 +265%
World of Tanks	87 −129%	190−200 +129%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	14 −264%	50−55 +264%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −108%	27−30 +108%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −158%	30−35 +158%
Dota 2	62 +10.7%	55−60 −10.7%
Far Cry 5	26 −115%	55−60 +115%
Forza Horizon 4	16 −300%	60−65 +300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	19 −484%	110−120 +484%
Valorant	16−18 −265%	60−65 +265%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	5−6 −360%	21−24 +360%
Elden Ring	5 −380%	24−27 +380%
Grand Theft Auto V	6−7 −283%	21−24 +283%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	43 −230%	140−150 +230%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −180%	14−16 +180%
World of Tanks	55 −98.2%	100−110 +98.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	10−11 −210%	30−35 +210%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −44.4%	12−14 +44.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −140%	12−14 +140%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −217%	35−40 +217%
Forza Horizon 4	10−11 −280%	35−40 +280%
Metro Exodus	7−8 −386%	30−35 +386%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 −186%	20−22 +186%
Valorant	16−18 −144%	35−40 +144%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 −58.8%	27−30 +58.8%
Elden Ring	3−4 −267%	10−12 +267%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 −58.8%	27−30 +58.8%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −1000%	10−12 +1000%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	21 −119%	45−50 +119%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −58.8%	27−30 +58.8%
World of Tanks	30 −150%	75−80 +150%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	5−6 −200%	14−16 +200%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Dota 2	24 −12.5%	27−30 +12.5%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −186%	20−22 +186%
Fortnite	5−6 −260%	18−20 +260%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −340%	21−24 +340%
Valorant	5−6 −240%	16−18 +240%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2

10−12

+0%

10−12

+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2

10−12

+0%

10−12

+0%

This is how GeForce MX150 and Pro 5300M compete in popular games:

Pro 5300M is 150% faster in 1080p
Pro 5300M is 150% faster in 1440p
Pro 5300M is 150% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GeForce MX150 is 11% faster.
in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Pro 5300M is 1000% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

GeForce MX150 is ahead in 1 test (2%)
Pro 5300M is ahead in 60 tests (95%)
there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	5.90	15.58
Recency	17 May 2017	13 November 2019
Chip lithography	14 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	85 Watt

GeForce MX150 has 750% lower power consumption.

Pro 5300M, on the other hand, has a 164.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro 5300M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce MX150 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce MX150 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro 5300M is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.