GeForce GTX 260M SLI vs MX150

Place in performance ranking	586	741
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	G9x (2007−2010)
GPU code name	N17S-G1	NB9E-GTX
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	16 May 2017 (7 years ago)	2 March 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	224
Core clock speed	1468 MHz	550 MHz
Boost clock speed	1532 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	1,800 million	1508 Million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	25 Watt (10 - 25 Watt TGP)	150 Watt
Texture fill rate	24.91	no data
Floating-point performance	0.7972 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	large
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	6008 MHz	950 MHz
Memory bandwidth	40.1 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	10
Shader Model	6.4	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	1.2	no data
Vulkan	1.2.131	-
CUDA	6.1	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce MX150 5.89
+79%

GTX 260M SLI 3.29

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GeForce MX150 10992
+22.7%

GTX 260M SLI 8959

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	28 +100%	14−16 −100%
1440p	29 +81.3%	16−18 −81.3%
4K	19 +90%	10−12 −90%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

10−11
+66.7%

6−7

−66.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	19 +90%	10−11 −90%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7−8 +600%	1−2 −600%
Battlefield 5	26 +333%	6−7 −333%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21 +200%	7−8 −200%
Cyberpunk 2077	11 +83.3%	6−7 −83.3%
Far Cry 5	20 +233%	6−7 −233%
Far Cry New Dawn	24 +167%	9−10 −167%
Forza Horizon 4	80 +371%	16−18 −371%
Hitman 3	12−14 +50%	8−9 −50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	100 +335%	21−24 −335%
Metro Exodus	23 +475%	4−5 −475%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27 +238%	8−9 −238%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	36 +177%	12−14 −177%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 +25%	40−45 −25%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21 +110%	10−11 −110%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7−8 +600%	1−2 −600%
Battlefield 5	18 +200%	6−7 −200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +71.4%	7−8 −71.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	7 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%
Far Cry 5	18 +200%	6−7 −200%
Far Cry New Dawn	9 +0%	9−10 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	71 +318%	16−18 −318%
Hitman 3	12−14 +50%	8−9 −50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	100 +335%	21−24 −335%
Metro Exodus	17 +325%	4−5 −325%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 +100%	8−9 −100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21 +61.5%	12−14 −61.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	52 +271%	14−16 −271%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 +25%	40−45 −25%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7 −42.9%	10−11 +42.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7−8 +600%	1−2 −600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +71.4%	7−8 −71.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 +66.7%	6−7 −66.7%
Far Cry 5	12 +100%	6−7 −100%
Forza Horizon 4	14 −21.4%	16−18 +21.4%
Hitman 3	12−14 +50%	8−9 −50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16 −43.8%	21−24 +43.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16 +23.1%	12−14 −23.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	11 −27.3%	14−16 +27.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 +25%	40−45 −25%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

16−18
+100%

8−9

−100%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	10−12 +120%	5−6 −120%
Far Cry New Dawn	9−10 +80%	5−6 −80%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 +100%	3−4 −100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Far Cry 5	7−8 +75%	4−5 −75%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 +88.9%	9−10 −88.9%
Hitman 3	10−11 +25%	8−9 −25%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 +62.5%	8−9 −62.5%
Metro Exodus	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	1−2	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 +100%	18−20 −100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−11
+42.9%

7−8

−42.9%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Hitman 3	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16 +100%	8−9 −100%
Metro Exodus	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	0−1	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

6−7
+50%

4−5

−50%

This is how GeForce MX150 and GTX 260M SLI compete in popular games:

GeForce MX150 is 100% faster in 1080p
GeForce MX150 is 81% faster in 1440p
GeForce MX150 is 90% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GeForce MX150 is 600% faster.
in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 260M SLI is 44% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

GeForce MX150 is ahead in 57 tests (92%)
GTX 260M SLI is ahead in 4 tests (6%)
there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	5.89	3.29
Recency	16 May 2017	2 March 2009
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	25 Watt	150 Watt

GeForce MX150 has a 79% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 292.9% more advanced lithography process, and 500% lower power consumption.

The GeForce MX150 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 260M SLI in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.