GeForce 9100 vs MX130

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce MX130 with GeForce 9100, including specs and performance data.

GeForce MX130
2017
2 GB GDDR5, 30 Watt
4.75
+2162%

MX130 outperforms 9100 by a whopping 2162% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking6491389
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency10.900.36
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGM108C78
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date17 November 2017 (7 years ago)17 April 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38416
Core clock speed1122 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speed1242 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data210 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate29.814.000
Floating-point processing power0.9539 TFLOPS0.0384 TFLOPS
ROPs84
TMUs248

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCI
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1253 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth40.1 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce MX130 4.75
+2162%
GeForce 9100 0.21

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce MX130 1826
+2154%
GeForce 9100 81

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD170−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 12−14 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 22 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 9−10 0−1
Metro Exodus 10−12 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16 0−1
Valorant 12−14 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11 0−1
Dota 2 21 0−1
Far Cry 5 26
+2500%
1−2
−2500%
Fortnite 24
+2300%
1−2
−2300%
Forza Horizon 4 16 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 9−10 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 15 0−1
Metro Exodus 10−12 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35
+3400%
1−2
−3400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14 0−1
Valorant 12−14 0−1
World of Tanks 75−80
+2500%
3−4
−2500%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 12−14 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11 0−1
Dota 2 28
+2700%
1−2
−2700%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+2200%
1−2
−2200%
Forza Horizon 4 14 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 9−10 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10 0−1
Valorant 12−14 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 4−5 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+3100%
1−2
−3100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4 0−1
World of Tanks 30−35
+3300%
1−2
−3300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 4−5 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 0−1
Far Cry 5 10−11 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 7−8 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 6−7 0−1
Metro Exodus 3−4 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9 0−1
Valorant 12−14 0−1

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−12 0−1
Dota 2 16−18 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18 0−1
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 10−12 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Dota 2 16−18 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6 0−1
Fortnite 4−5 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 4−5 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 2−3 0−1
Valorant 4−5 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.75 0.21
Recency 17 November 2017 17 April 2007
Chip lithography 28 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 40 Watt

GeForce MX130 has a 2161.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 33.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce MX130 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9100 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce MX130 is a notebook card while GeForce 9100 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX130
GeForce MX130
NVIDIA GeForce 9100
GeForce 9100

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 2289 votes

Rate GeForce MX130 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 19 votes

Rate GeForce 9100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.