GeForce 8800M GTS vs MX130

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce MX130 and GeForce 8800M GTS, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GeForce MX130
2017
2 GB GDDR5, 30 Watt
4.73
+378%

MX130 outperforms 8800M GTS by a whopping 378% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking6531116
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency10.841.36
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGM108G92
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date17 November 2017 (7 years ago)1 November 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38464
Core clock speed1122 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speed1242 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data754 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate29.8116.00
Floating-point processing power0.9539 TFLOPS0.16 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs2432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-HE
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB512 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth40.1 GB/s51.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+1.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce MX130 4.73
+378%
8800M GTS 0.99

  • Other tests
    • Passmark
    • 3DMark Vantage Performance

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce MX130 1823
+377%
8800M GTS 382

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GeForce MX130 11968
+369%
8800M GTS 2552

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18
+500%
3−4
−500%

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
Atomic Heart 12
+300%
3−4
−300%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 4
+100%
2−3
−100%
Atomic Heart 8
+167%
3−4
−167%
Battlefield 5 18−20
+500%
3−4
−500%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Far Cry 5 14
+600%
2−3
−600%
Fortnite 32
+3100%
1−2
−3100%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+320%
5−6
−320%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 23
+188%
8−9
−188%
Valorant 55−60
+83.9%
30−35
−83.9%
Atomic Heart 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Battlefield 5 18−20
+500%
3−4
−500%
Counter-Strike 2 3
−133%
7−8
+133%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 75−80
+225%
24−27
−225%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Dota 2 35
+150%
14−16
−150%
Far Cry 5 13
+550%
2−3
−550%
Fortnite 24
+2300%
1−2
−2300%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+320%
5−6
−320%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Grand Theft Auto V 15
+400%
3−4
−400%
Metro Exodus 3
+200%
1−2
−200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21
+163%
8−9
−163%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
+180%
5−6
−180%
Valorant 55−60
+83.9%
30−35
−83.9%
Battlefield 5 18−20
+500%
3−4
−500%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Dota 2 28
+100%
14−16
−100%
Far Cry 5 12
+500%
2−3
−500%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+320%
5−6
−320%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14
+75%
8−9
−75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7
+40%
5−6
−40%
Valorant 55−60
+83.9%
30−35
−83.9%
Fortnite 16
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
+580%
5−6
−580%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5 0−1
Metro Exodus 3−4 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+540%
5−6
−540%
Valorant 45−50 0−1
Battlefield 5 3−4 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Far Cry 5 8−9 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Fortnite 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Atomic Heart 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
Valorant 21−24
+340%
5−6
−340%
Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 14−16
+400%
3−4
−400%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Fortnite 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

This is how GeForce MX130 and 8800M GTS compete in popular games:

  • GeForce MX130 is 500% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Fortnite, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GeForce MX130 is 3100% faster.
  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the 8800M GTS is 133% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GeForce MX130 is ahead in 40 tests (95%)
  • 8800M GTS is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.73 0.99
Recency 17 November 2017 1 November 2007
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 50 Watt

GeForce MX130 has a 377.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 132.1% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

The GeForce MX130 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8800M GTS in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX130
GeForce MX130
NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTS
GeForce 8800M GTS

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6
2316 votes

Rate GeForce MX130 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2
17 votes

Rate GeForce 8800M GTS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce MX130 or GeForce 8800M GTS, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.