Arc A530M vs GeForce MX130

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce MX130 and Arc A530M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GeForce MX130
2017
2 GB GDDR5, 30 Watt
4.75

Arc A530M outperforms MX130 by a whopping 273% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking641304
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency11.0419.00
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameGM108DG2-256
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date17 November 2017 (7 years ago)1 August 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3841536
Core clock speed1122 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed1242 MHz1300 MHz
Number of transistorsno data11,500 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate29.81124.8
Floating-point processing power0.9539 TFLOPS3.994 TFLOPS
ROPs848
TMUs2496
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth40.1 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce MX130 4.75
Arc A530M 17.72
+273%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce MX130 1833
Arc A530M 6836
+273%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18
−261%
65−70
+261%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4
+100%
2−3
−100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
Battlefield 5 12−14
−233%
40−45
+233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Far Cry 5 14
−257%
50−55
+257%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−246%
45−50
+246%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
−267%
110−120
+267%
Hitman 3 9
+125%
4−5
−125%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+288%
8−9
−288%
Metro Exodus 10−12
−264%
40−45
+264%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−246%
45−50
+246%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 26
+550%
4−5
−550%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+64.3%
27−30
−64.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
Battlefield 5 12−14
−233%
40−45
+233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Far Cry 5 11
−264%
40−45
+264%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−246%
45−50
+246%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
−267%
110−120
+267%
Hitman 3 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+288%
8−9
−288%
Metro Exodus 10−12
−264%
40−45
+264%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−246%
45−50
+246%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16
+300%
4−5
−300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+88.9%
9−10
−88.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+64.3%
27−30
−64.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Far Cry 5 8
−238%
27−30
+238%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
−267%
110−120
+267%
Hitman 3 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 13
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14
+250%
4−5
−250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+64.3%
27−30
−64.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−246%
45−50
+246%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
−233%
30−33
+233%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−243%
24−27
+243%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−250%
35−40
+250%
Hitman 3 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−267%
110−120
+267%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Hitman 3 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%

This is how GeForce MX130 and Arc A530M compete in popular games:

  • Arc A530M is 261% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GeForce MX130 is 550% faster.
  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Arc A530M is 29% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GeForce MX130 is ahead in 28 tests (97%)
  • Arc A530M is ahead in 1 test (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.75 17.72
Recency 17 November 2017 1 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 65 Watt

GeForce MX130 has 116.7% lower power consumption.

Arc A530M, on the other hand, has a 273.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc A530M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce MX130 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX130
GeForce MX130
Intel Arc A530M
Arc A530M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 2208 votes

Rate GeForce MX130 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 184 votes

Rate Arc A530M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.