Radeon RX 6600S vs GeForce MX110

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce MX110 and Radeon RX 6600S, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GeForce MX110
2017
2 GB GDDR5, 30 Watt
3.72

RX 6600S outperforms MX110 by a whopping 767% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking706169
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.6428.11
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGM108SNavi 23
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date17 November 2017 (7 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2561792
Core clock speed978 MHz1700 MHz
Boost clock speed1006 MHz2000 MHz
Number of transistors1,020 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate16.10224.0
Floating-point processing power0.5151 TFLOPS7.168 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs16112
Ray Tracing Coresno data28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth40.1 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.7 (5.1)6.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce MX110 3.72
RX 6600S 32.26
+767%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce MX110 1434
RX 6600S 12444
+768%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD17
−724%
140−150
+724%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−771%
60−65
+771%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9
−744%
75−80
+744%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−1933%
60−65
+1933%
Battlefield 5 8−9
−1338%
110−120
+1338%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8
−800%
70−75
+800%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−771%
60−65
+771%
Far Cry 5 10
−680%
75−80
+680%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
−790%
85−90
+790%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−723%
180−190
+723%
Hitman 3 9−10
−733%
75−80
+733%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−481%
150−160
+481%
Metro Exodus 13
−792%
110−120
+792%
Red Dead Redemption 2 13
−554%
85−90
+554%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16
−694%
120−130
+694%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−193%
120−130
+193%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12
−533%
75−80
+533%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−1933%
60−65
+1933%
Battlefield 5 8−9
−1338%
110−120
+1338%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−800%
70−75
+800%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−771%
60−65
+771%
Far Cry 5 8
−875%
75−80
+875%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
−790%
85−90
+790%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−723%
180−190
+723%
Hitman 3 9−10
−733%
75−80
+733%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−481%
150−160
+481%
Metro Exodus 5
−2220%
110−120
+2220%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−844%
85−90
+844%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−807%
120−130
+807%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−393%
70−75
+393%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−193%
120−130
+193%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
−591%
75−80
+591%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−1933%
60−65
+1933%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−800%
70−75
+800%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−771%
60−65
+771%
Far Cry 5 6
−1200%
75−80
+1200%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−723%
180−190
+723%
Hitman 3 9−10
−733%
75−80
+733%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−481%
150−160
+481%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−807%
120−130
+807%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5
−1380%
70−75
+1380%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−193%
120−130
+193%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−844%
85−90
+844%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
−871%
65−70
+871%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
−800%
50−55
+800%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−1167%
35−40
+1167%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−1267%
40−45
+1267%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−925%
40−45
+925%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−6633%
200−210
+6633%
Hitman 3 8−9
−463%
45−50
+463%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
−744%
75−80
+744%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−1533%
45−50
+1533%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
−683%
180−190
+683%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−771%
60−65
+771%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−1650%
35−40
+1650%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−1350%
27−30
+1350%
Metro Exodus 0−1 40−45

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−667%
21−24
+667%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−2100%
21−24
+2100%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 10−12
Far Cry 5 2−3
−900%
20−22
+900%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−2350%
45−50
+2350%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−1600%
16−18
+1600%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−520%
30−35
+520%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Metro Exodus 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

4K
High Preset

Hitman 3 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

This is how GeForce MX110 and RX 6600S compete in popular games:

  • RX 6600S is 724% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6600S is 6633% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 6600S is ahead in 63 tests (90%)
  • there's a draw in 7 tests (10%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.72 32.26
Recency 17 November 2017 4 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 80 Watt

GeForce MX110 has 166.7% lower power consumption.

RX 6600S, on the other hand, has a 767.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6600S is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce MX110 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX110
GeForce MX110
AMD Radeon RX 6600S
Radeon RX 6600S

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 2263 votes

Rate GeForce MX110 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 13 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6600S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.