Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150 vs GeForce MX110

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking708not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.62no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Gen. 4 (2007−2010)
GPU code nameGM108SPineview
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date17 November 2017 (7 years ago)10 January 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2562
Core clock speed978 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1006 MHz200 MHz
Number of transistors1,020 million123 Million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Wattno data
Texture fill rate16.10no data
Floating-point processing power0.5151 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8no data
TMUs16no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x4no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount2 GBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1253 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth40.1 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependentno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)no data
Shader Model6.7 (5.1)no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3-
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 November 2017 10 January 2010
Chip lithography 28 nm 45 nm

GeForce MX110 has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 60.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce MX110 and Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX110
GeForce MX110
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 2264 votes

Rate GeForce MX110 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 343 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.