GeForce4 410 Go vs GeForce MX110

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking710not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.47no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameGM108SNV17 A3
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date17 November 2017 (7 years ago)6 February 2002 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256no data
Core clock speed978 MHz200 MHz
Boost clock speed1006 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,020 million29 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Wattno data
Texture fill rate16.100.8
Floating-point processing power0.5151 TFLOPSno data
ROPs82
TMUs164

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x4AGP 4x
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount2 GB16 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidth40.1 GB/s3.2 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)8.0
Shader Model6.7 (5.1)no data
OpenGL4.61.3
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 November 2017 6 February 2002
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 16 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 150 nm

GeForce MX110 has an age advantage of 15 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 435.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce MX110 and GeForce4 410 Go. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX110
GeForce MX110
NVIDIA GeForce4 410 Go
GeForce4 410 Go

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 2282 votes

Rate GeForce MX110 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce4 410 Go on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.