GeForce 720A vs MX110

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce MX110 and GeForce 720A, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GeForce MX110
2017
2 GB GDDR5, 30 Watt
3.71
+133%

MX110 outperforms 720A by a whopping 133% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking710961
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.483.30
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGM108SGF117
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date17 November 2017 (7 years ago)1 July 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25696
Core clock speed978 MHz775 MHz
Boost clock speed1006 MHz938 MHz
Number of transistors1,020 million585 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt33 Watt
Texture fill rate16.1015.01
Floating-point processing power0.5151 TFLOPS0.1801 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs1616

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x4PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth40.1 GB/s16 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.7 (5.1)5.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.01.1
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA+2.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce MX110 3.71
+133%
GeForce 720A 1.59

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce MX110 1431
+133%
GeForce 720A 614

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD17
+143%
7−8
−143%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9
+200%
3−4
−200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Battlefield 5 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8
+167%
3−4
−167%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Far Cry 5 10
+150%
4−5
−150%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+144%
9−10
−144%
Hitman 3 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+160%
10−11
−160%
Metro Exodus 13
+160%
5−6
−160%
Red Dead Redemption 2 13
+160%
5−6
−160%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16
+167%
6−7
−167%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+133%
18−20
−133%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12
+140%
5−6
−140%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Battlefield 5 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Far Cry 5 8
+167%
3−4
−167%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+144%
9−10
−144%
Hitman 3 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+160%
10−11
−160%
Metro Exodus 5
+150%
2−3
−150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+150%
6−7
−150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+133%
18−20
−133%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Far Cry 5 6
+200%
2−3
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+144%
9−10
−144%
Hitman 3 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+160%
10−11
−160%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5
+150%
2−3
−150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+133%
18−20
−133%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Hitman 3 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
+156%
9−10
−156%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3 0−1
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%

This is how GeForce MX110 and GeForce 720A compete in popular games:

  • GeForce MX110 is 143% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.71 1.59
Recency 17 November 2017 1 July 2014
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 33 Watt

GeForce MX110 has a 133.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 10% lower power consumption.

The GeForce MX110 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 720A in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX110
GeForce MX110
NVIDIA GeForce 720A
GeForce 720A

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 2280 votes

Rate GeForce MX110 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 6 votes

Rate GeForce 720A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.