GRID A100A vs GeForce Go 7950 GTX

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1175not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.05no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameG71GA100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date12 October 2006 (18 years ago)14 May 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores326912
Core clock speed575 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed575 MHz1005 MHz
Number of transistors278 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt400 Watt
Texture fill rate13.80434.2
Floating-point processing powerno data13.89 TFLOPS
ROPs16192
TMUs24432
Tensor Coresno data432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-IIIPCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount512 MB48 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit6144 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1215 MHz
Memory bandwidth44.8 GB/s1,866 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.5
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA-8.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 October 2006 14 May 2020
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 48 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 400 Watt

Go 7950 GTX has 788.9% lower power consumption.

GRID A100A, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, a 9500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce Go 7950 GTX and GRID A100A. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce Go 7950 GTX is a notebook card while GRID A100A is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce Go 7950 GTX
GeForce Go 7950 GTX
NVIDIA GRID A100A
GRID A100A

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 3 votes

Rate GeForce Go 7950 GTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 9 votes

Rate GRID A100A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.