Radeon RX 7900 XT vs GeForce Go 7900 GTX

Place in the ranking	1163	13
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	37.49
Power efficiency	1.08	17.26
Architecture	Curie (2003−2013)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code name	G71	Navi 31
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	18 April 2006 (18 years ago)	3 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$899

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	32	5376
Core clock speed	500 MHz	1387 MHz
Boost clock speed	500 MHz	2394 MHz
Number of transistors	278 million	57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	90 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	45 Watt	300 Watt
Texture fill rate	12.00	804.4
Floating-point processing power	no data	51.48 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	192
TMUs	24	336
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 1.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	276 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	20 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	320 Bit
Memory clock speed	600 MHz	2500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	38.4 GB/s	800.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	9.0c (9_3)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	3.0	6.7
OpenGL	2.1	4.6
OpenCL	N/A	2.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Go 7900 GTX 0.70

RX 7900 XT 74.75
+10579%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Go 7900 GTX 270

RX 7900 XT 28842
+10582%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	1−2 −20600%	207 +20600%
1440p	1−2 −14200%	143 +14200%
4K	0−1	87

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	4.34
1440p	no data	6.29
4K	no data	10.33

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

3−4

−7800%

237
+7800%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −3725%	150−160 +3725%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −3900%	120−130 +3900%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −6967%	212 +6967%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −18400%	180−190 +18400%
Hitman 3	5−6 −2480%	120−130 +2480%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 −2336%	260−270 +2336%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	120−130
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −5233%	300−350 +5233%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −394%	150−160 +394%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −3725%	150−160 +3725%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −3900%	120−130 +3900%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −6233%	190 +6233%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −18400%	180−190 +18400%
Hitman 3	5−6 −2480%	120−130 +2480%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 −2336%	260−270 +2336%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	120−130
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −8100%	492 +8100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −1520%	160−170 +1520%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −394%	150−160 +394%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −3725%	150−160 +3725%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −3900%	120−130 +3900%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −5867%	179 +5867%
Hitman 3	5−6 −2480%	120−130 +2480%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 −3082%	350 +3082%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −6967%	424 +6967%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −2550%	265 +2550%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −394%	150−160 +394%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

0−1

120−130

1440p
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

1−2

−11100%

110−120
+11100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	85−90
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −12100%	122 +12100%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −8300%	80−85 +8300%
Hitman 3	6−7 −1717%	100−110 +1717%
Horizon Zero Dawn	3−4 −9133%	277 +9133%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 −11900%	240−250 +11900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

−3900%

120−130
+3900%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

0−1

65−70

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −6200%	60−65 +6200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	60−65

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−4100%

80−85
+4100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%
Battlefield 5	240−250 +0%	240−250 +0%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	240−250 +0%	240−250 +0%
Metro Exodus	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%
Battlefield 5	240−250 +0%	240−250 +0%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	240−250 +0%	240−250 +0%
Metro Exodus	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	240−250 +0%	240−250 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5

160−170

+0%

160−170

+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	270−280 +0%	270−280 +0%
Metro Exodus	141 +0%	141 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	325 +0%	325 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Hitman 3	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	220−230 +0%	220−230 +0%
Metro Exodus	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	159 +0%	159 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	60 +0%	60 +0%
Far Cry 5	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	173 +0%	173 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%

This is how Go 7900 GTX and RX 7900 XT compete in popular games:

RX 7900 XT is 20600% faster in 1080p
RX 7900 XT is 14200% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Far Cry New Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 7900 XT is 18400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RX 7900 XT is ahead in 35 tests (53%)
there's a draw in 31 test (47%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.70	74.75
Recency	18 April 2006	3 November 2022
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	20 GB
Chip lithography	90 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	45 Watt	300 Watt

Go 7900 GTX has 566.7% lower power consumption.

RX 7900 XT, on the other hand, has a 10578.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, a 3900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1700% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7900 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 7900 GTX in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce Go 7900 GTX is a notebook card while Radeon RX 7900 XT is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.