ATI Graphics Ultra + vs GeForce Go 7900 GTX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1169not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.08no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)no data
GPU code nameG71Mach32
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date18 April 2006 (18 years ago)1 January 1992 (32 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32no data
Core clock speed500 MHz10 MHz
Boost clock speed500 MHzno data
Number of transistors278 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology90 nm800 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Wattno data
Texture fill rate12.00no data
ROPs161
TMUs24no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCI
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DRAM
Maximum RAM amount512 MB1 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz10 MHz
Memory bandwidth38.4 GB/s80.0 MB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)None
Shader Model3.0no data
OpenGL2.1None
OpenCLN/ANone
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 April 2006 1 January 1992
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 1 MB
Chip lithography 90 nm 800 nm

Go 7900 GTX has an age advantage of 14 years, a 51100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 788.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce Go 7900 GTX and Graphics Ultra +. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce Go 7900 GTX is a notebook card while Graphics Ultra + is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce Go 7900 GTX
GeForce Go 7900 GTX
ATI Graphics Ultra +
Graphics Ultra +

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1 vote

Rate GeForce Go 7900 GTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Graphics Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.