ATI Radeon X850 XT vs GeForce Go 7900 GTX SLI

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureG7x (2005−2006)R400 (2004−2008)
GPU code nameG71MR480
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date12 October 2006 (18 years ago)1 December 2004 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64no data
Core clock speed16 MHz520 MHz
Boost clock speed500 MHzno data
Number of transistors556 Million160 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt69 Watt
Texture fill rateno data8.320
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2x512 MB256 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz540 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data34.56 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXGDDR39.0b (9_2)
OpenGLno data2.0
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 October 2006 1 December 2004
Chip lithography 90 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 69 Watt

Go 7900 GTX SLI has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

ATI X850 XT, on the other hand, has 30.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce Go 7900 GTX SLI and Radeon X850 XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce Go 7900 GTX SLI is a notebook card while Radeon X850 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce Go 7900 GTX SLI
GeForce Go 7900 GTX SLI
ATI Radeon X850 XT
Radeon X850 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce Go 7900 GTX SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 12 votes

Rate Radeon X850 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.