Quadro FX 4400 vs GeForce Go 7800

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1333not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.59no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameG70NV45
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date3 March 2006 (18 years ago)28 July 2005 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,399

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores22no data
Core clock speed400 MHz375 MHz
Boost clock speed400 MHzno data
Number of transistors302 million222 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt83 Watt
Texture fill rate6.4004.500
ROPs1612
TMUs1612

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed550 MHz525 MHz
Memory bandwidth35.2 GB/s33.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model3.03.0
OpenGL2.12.1
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 March 2006 28 July 2005
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 110 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 83 Watt

Go 7800 has an age advantage of 7 months, a 18.2% more advanced lithography process, and 137.1% lower power consumption.

FX 4400, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between GeForce Go 7800 and Quadro FX 4400. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce Go 7800 is a notebook card while Quadro FX 4400 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce Go 7800
GeForce Go 7800
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4400
Quadro FX 4400

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate GeForce Go 7800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 6 votes

Rate Quadro FX 4400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.