Arc Pro A30M vs GeForce Go 7800 GTX

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce Go 7800 GTX with Arc Pro A30M, including specs and performance data.

Go 7800 GTX
2005
512 MB GDDR3, 65 Watt
0.54

Arc Pro A30M outperforms Go 7800 GTX by a whopping 2713% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1214345
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.5821.04
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameG70DG2-128
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date29 September 2005 (19 years ago)8 August 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores321024
Core clock speed440 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speed440 MHz2000 MHz
Number of transistors302 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate10.56128.0
Floating-point processing powerno data4.096 TFLOPS
ROPs2432
TMUs2464
Ray Tracing Coresno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed550 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth35.2 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.6
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Go 7800 GTX 0.54
Arc Pro A30M 15.19
+2713%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Go 7800 GTX 209
Arc Pro A30M 5862
+2705%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2567%
80−85
+2567%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−2650%
110−120
+2650%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−2567%
80−85
+2567%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2567%
80−85
+2567%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
Hitman 3 5−6
−2700%
140−150
+2700%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−2700%
280−290
+2700%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−2567%
160−170
+2567%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−2567%
800−850
+2567%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−2650%
110−120
+2650%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−2567%
80−85
+2567%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2567%
80−85
+2567%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
Hitman 3 5−6
−2700%
140−150
+2700%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−2700%
280−290
+2700%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−2567%
160−170
+2567%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−2700%
280−290
+2700%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−2567%
800−850
+2567%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−2650%
110−120
+2650%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−2567%
80−85
+2567%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2567%
80−85
+2567%
Hitman 3 5−6
−2700%
140−150
+2700%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−2700%
280−290
+2700%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−2567%
160−170
+2567%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−2700%
280−290
+2700%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−2567%
800−850
+2567%

1440p
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
Hitman 3 6−7
−2567%
160−170
+2567%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−2567%
80−85
+2567%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−2567%
80−85
+2567%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−2650%
55−60
+2650%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.54 15.19
Recency 29 September 2005 8 August 2022
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 110 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 50 Watt

Arc Pro A30M has a 2713% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 1733.3% more advanced lithography process, and 30% lower power consumption.

The Arc Pro A30M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 7800 GTX in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce Go 7800 GTX is a notebook graphics card while Arc Pro A30M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce Go 7800 GTX
GeForce Go 7800 GTX
Intel Arc Pro A30M
Arc Pro A30M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.5 8 votes

Rate GeForce Go 7800 GTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 6 votes

Rate Arc Pro A30M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.