Radeon RX 6900 XT vs GeForce Go 7600

Place in the ranking	1309	23
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	29.52
Power efficiency	no data	15.96
Architecture	Curie (2003−2013)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code name	G73	Navi 21
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	1 March 2006 (18 years ago)	28 October 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	13	5120
Core clock speed	450 MHz	1825 MHz
Boost clock speed	450 MHz	2250 MHz
Number of transistors	177 million	26,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	90 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	300 Watt
Texture fill rate	3.600	720.0
Floating-point processing power	no data	23.04 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	128
TMUs	8	320
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	80

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 1.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	3-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	256 MB	16 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	350 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	11.2 GB/s	512.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	9.0c (9_3)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	3.0	6.5
OpenGL	2.1	4.6
OpenCL	N/A	2.1
Vulkan	N/A	1.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Go 7600 0.33

RX 6900 XT 69.56
+20979%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Go 7600 127

RX 6900 XT 26742
+20957%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	0−1	188
1440p	0−1	130
4K	-0−1	81

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	5.31
1440p	no data	7.68
4K	no data	12.33

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −1950%	160−170 +1950%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −7950%	160−170 +7950%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −1950%	160−170 +1950%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −3700%	76 +3700%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −7680%	350−400 +7680%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −3075%	120−130 +3075%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −1950%	160−170 +1950%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −3100%	64 +3100%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −2100%	130−140 +2100%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −7680%	350−400 +7680%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 −2971%	210−220 +2971%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −3000%	124 +3000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −3380%	170−180 +3380%
World of Tanks	12−14 −2046%	270−280 +2046%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −1950%	160−170 +1950%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −2550%	53 +2550%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −2100%	130−140 +2100%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −7680%	350−400 +7680%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 −2971%	210−220 +2971%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS

2−3

−8650%

170−180
+8650%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −933%	90−95 +933%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −1700%	36 +1700%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −3900%	160−170 +3900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −7600%	150−160 +7600%
Valorant	5−6 −6460%	328 +6460%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	14−16 −940%	150−160 +940%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −940%	150−160 +940%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	1−2 −20800%	200−210 +20800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −947%	150−160 +947%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	90−95
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −1600%	17 +1600%
Dota 2	14−16 −940%	150−160 +940%
Valorant	1−2 −18400%	185 +18400%

Full HD
Low Preset

Elden Ring

260−270

+0%

260−270

+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Metro Exodus	126 +0%	126 +0%
Valorant	480 +0%	480 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Dota 2	160−170 +0%	160−170 +0%
Elden Ring	260−270 +0%	260−270 +0%
Fortnite	270−280 +0%	270−280 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	160−170 +0%	160−170 +0%
Metro Exodus	123 +0%	123 +0%
Valorant	300−350 +0%	300−350 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Dota 2	160−170 +0%	160−170 +0%
Valorant	411 +0%	411 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%
Elden Ring	180−190 +0%	180−190 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	82 +0%	82 +0%
World of Tanks	450−500 +0%	450−500 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	250−260 +0%	250−260 +0%
Metro Exodus	117 +0%	117 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Elden Ring	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Metro Exodus	67 +0%	67 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	55 +0%	55 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Far Cry 5	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Fortnite	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RX 6900 XT is 20800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RX 6900 XT is ahead in 32 tests (52%)
there's a draw in 30 tests (48%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.33	69.56
Recency	1 March 2006	28 October 2020
Maximum RAM amount	256 MB	16 GB
Chip lithography	90 nm	7 nm

RX 6900 XT has a 20978.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6900 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 7600 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce Go 7600 is a notebook card while Radeon RX 6900 XT is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.