TITAN RTX vs GeForce Go 7600 GT

Place in performance ranking	1225	64
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	7.85
Architecture	no data	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	G73M	TU102
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	1 August 2006 (18 years ago)	18 December 2018 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$2,499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	17	4608
Core clock speed	5 MHz	1350 MHz
Boost clock speed	500 MHz	1770 MHz
Number of transistors	177 million	18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	90 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	280 Watt
Texture fill rate	6.000	509.8
Floating-point performance	no data	16.31 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 1.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3, GDDR2, GDDR1	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	256 MB	24 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	no data	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	19.2 GB/s	672.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	9.0c (9_3)	12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model	3.0	6.5
OpenGL	2.1	4.6
OpenCL	N/A	2.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA	-	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Go 7600 GT 0.54

TITAN RTX 48.87
+8950%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Go 7600 GT 210

TITAN RTX 18858
+8880%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	1−2 −16000%	161 +16000%
1440p	1−2 −10500%	106 +10500%
4K	0−1	74

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

3−4

−2533%

79
+2533%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −2500%	104 +2500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −4667%	143 +4667%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −2533%	79 +2533%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −20000%	201 +20000%
Hitman 3	5−6 −2240%	117 +2240%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 −3380%	348 +3380%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −3333%	206 +3333%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 −617%	215 +617%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −4550%	186 +4550%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −4267%	131 +4267%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −2533%	79 +2533%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −15300%	154 +15300%
Hitman 3	5−6 −2220%	116 +2220%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 −3260%	336 +3260%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −4667%	286 +4667%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −910%	100−110 +910%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 −580%	204 +580%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −1875%	79 +1875%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −3300%	102 +3300%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −2500%	78 +2500%
Hitman 3	5−6 −2120%	111 +2120%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 −2080%	218 +2080%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −3933%	242 +3933%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −1290%	139 +1290%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 −187%	86 +187%

1440p
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

1−2

−7400%

75−80
+7400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	50−55
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −6500%	66 +6500%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −5600%	55−60 +5600%
Hitman 3	6−7 −1567%	100 +1567%
Horizon Zero Dawn	3−4 −5500%	168 +5500%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −20400%	205 +20400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

−3867%

119
+3867%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −5100%	52 +5100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	43

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−3600%

74
+3600%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	104 +0%	104 +0%
Battlefield 5	209 +0%	209 +0%
Far Cry 5	127 +0%	127 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	281 +0%	281 +0%
Metro Exodus	144 +0%	144 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	127 +0%	127 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	88 +0%	88 +0%
Battlefield 5	203 +0%	203 +0%
Far Cry 5	101 +0%	101 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	254 +0%	254 +0%
Metro Exodus	144 +0%	144 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	110 +0%	110 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	80 +0%	80 +0%
Far Cry 5	79 +0%	79 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	175 +0%	175 +0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

123

+0%

123

+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5

95−100

+0%

95−100

+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	66 +0%	66 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	79 +0%	79 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	250−260 +0%	250−260 +0%
Metro Exodus	114 +0%	114 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	183 +0%	183 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	88 +0%	88 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	67 +0%	67 +0%
Hitman 3	48 +0%	48 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	150 +0%	150 +0%
Metro Exodus	121 +0%	121 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	103 +0%	103 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50 +0%	50 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	33 +0%	33 +0%
Far Cry 5	49 +0%	49 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	114 +0%	114 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	109 +0%	109 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	43 +0%	43 +0%

This is how Go 7600 GT and TITAN RTX compete in popular games:

TITAN RTX is 16000% faster in 1080p
TITAN RTX is 10500% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the TITAN RTX is 20400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

TITAN RTX is ahead in 35 tests (50%)
there's a draw in 35 tests (50%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.54	48.87
Recency	1 August 2006	18 December 2018
Maximum RAM amount	256 MB	24 GB
Chip lithography	90 nm	12 nm

TITAN RTX has a 8950% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 9500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 650% more advanced lithography process.

The TITAN RTX is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 7600 GT in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce Go 7600 GT is a notebook card while TITAN RTX is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.