T400 vs GeForce Go 6800 Ultra

Place in the ranking	1283	470
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	0.28	21.85
Architecture	Curie (2003−2013)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	NV41	TU117
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	24 February 2005 (19 years ago)	6 May 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	17	384
Core clock speed	450 MHz	420 MHz
Boost clock speed	450 MHz	1425 MHz
Number of transistors	190 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	130 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	89 Watt	30 Watt
Texture fill rate	5.400	34.20
Floating-point processing power	no data	1.094 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	16
TMUs	12	24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 1.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	256 MB	2 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	600 MHz	1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	38.4 GB/s	80 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

Portable Device Dependent

3x mini-DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	9.0c (9_3)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	3.0	6.6
OpenGL	2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)	4.6
OpenCL	N/A	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2
CUDA	-	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Go 6800 Ultra 0.36

T400 9.40
+2511%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Go 6800 Ultra 137

T400 3626
+2547%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

2−3

−2400%

50−55
+2400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −2400%	75−80 +2400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −2400%	50−55 +2400%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −2400%	50−55 +2400%
Hitman 3	4−5 −2400%	100−105 +2400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −2400%	200−210 +2400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −2400%	100−105 +2400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −2400%	700−750 +2400%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −2400%	75−80 +2400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −2400%	50−55 +2400%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −2400%	50−55 +2400%
Hitman 3	4−5 −2400%	100−105 +2400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −2400%	200−210 +2400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −2400%	100−105 +2400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −2456%	230−240 +2456%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −2400%	700−750 +2400%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −2400%	75−80 +2400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −2400%	50−55 +2400%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −2400%	50−55 +2400%
Hitman 3	4−5 −2400%	100−105 +2400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −2400%	200−210 +2400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −2400%	100−105 +2400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −2456%	230−240 +2456%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −2400%	700−750 +2400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Hitman 3	6−7 −2400%	150−160 +2400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 −2400%	50−55 +2400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−2400%

50−55
+2400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −2300%	24−27 +2300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−2400%

50−55
+2400%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.36	9.40
Recency	24 February 2005	6 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount	256 MB	2 GB
Chip lithography	130 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	89 Watt	30 Watt

T400 has a 2511.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 983.3% more advanced lithography process, and 196.7% lower power consumption.

The T400 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 6800 Ultra in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce Go 6800 Ultra is a notebook card while T400 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.