Radeon Pro Vega II vs GeForce GTX TITAN X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX TITAN X with Radeon Pro Vega II, including specs and performance data.

GTX TITAN X
2015
12 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
33.53

Pro Vega II outperforms GTX TITAN X by a significant 21% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking158100
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.1716.40
Power efficiency9.195.84
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGM200Vega 20
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date17 March 2015 (9 years ago)3 June 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999 $2,199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Pro Vega II has 101% better value for money than GTX TITAN X.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores30724096
Core clock speed1000 MHz1574 MHz
Boost clock speed1075 MHz1720 MHz
Number of transistors8,000 million13,230 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt475 Watt
Texture fill rate209.1440.3
Floating-point processing power6.691 TFLOPS14.09 TFLOPS
ROPs9664
TMUs192256

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16Apple MPX
Length267 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotQuad-slot
Recommended system power (PSU)600 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone
SLI options4x-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount12 GB32 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed7.0 GB/s806 MHz
Memory bandwidth336.5 GB/s825.3 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.21x HDMI 2.0b, 4x Thunderbolt
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI++
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+-
GeForce ShadowPlay+-
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA5.2-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX TITAN X 33.53
Pro Vega II 40.47
+20.7%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX TITAN X 12921
Pro Vega II 15596
+20.7%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 33.53 40.47
Recency 17 March 2015 3 June 2019
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 475 Watt

GTX TITAN X has 90% lower power consumption.

Pro Vega II, on the other hand, has a 20.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro Vega II is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX TITAN X in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX TITAN X is a desktop card while Radeon Pro Vega II is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
GeForce GTX TITAN X
AMD Radeon Pro Vega II
Radeon Pro Vega II

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 221 vote

Rate GeForce GTX TITAN X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 81 vote

Rate Radeon Pro Vega II on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.