Quadro P4200 vs GeForce GTX 980M SLI

Place in the ranking	224	213
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	8.44	17.26
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2017)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	no data	GP104
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	7 October 2014 (10 years ago)	21 February 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3072	2304
Core clock speed	1038 MHz	1227 MHz
Boost clock speed	1127 MHz	1647 MHz
Number of transistors	2x 5200 Million	7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	200 Watt	100 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	237.2
Floating-point processing power	no data	7.589 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	64
TMUs	no data	144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	large
Interface	no data	MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2x 8 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	2x 256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	192.3 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12_1	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	no data	6.4
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	1.2
Vulkan	+	1.2.131
CUDA	+	6.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	135 +3.8%	130−140 −3.8%
Full HD	110 +0%	110−120 +0%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

40−45

−2.5%

40−45
+2.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	50−55 −1.9%	55−60 +1.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 −2.4%	40−45 +2.4%
Battlefield 5	80−85 −1.2%	80−85 +1.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 −2%	50−55 +2%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 −2.5%	40−45 +2.5%
Far Cry 5	55−60 −1.8%	55−60 +1.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70 −1.5%	65−70 +1.5%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 −0.7%	140−150 +0.7%
Hitman 3	50−55 −2%	50−55 +2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 −1.8%	110−120 +1.8%
Metro Exodus	85−90 −1.2%	85−90 +1.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	60−65 −1.6%	65−70 +1.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	80−85 −1.2%	85−90 +1.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	50−55 −1.9%	55−60 +1.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 −2.4%	40−45 +2.4%
Battlefield 5	80−85 −1.2%	80−85 +1.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 −2%	50−55 +2%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 −2.5%	40−45 +2.5%
Far Cry 5	55−60 −1.8%	55−60 +1.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70 −1.5%	65−70 +1.5%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 −0.7%	140−150 +0.7%
Hitman 3	50−55 −2%	50−55 +2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 −1.8%	110−120 +1.8%
Metro Exodus	85−90 −1.2%	85−90 +1.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	60−65 −1.6%	65−70 +1.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	80−85 −1.2%	85−90 +1.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	50−55 −1.9%	55−60 +1.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 −2.4%	40−45 +2.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 −2%	50−55 +2%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 −2.5%	40−45 +2.5%
Far Cry 5	55−60 −1.8%	55−60 +1.8%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 −0.7%	140−150 +0.7%
Hitman 3	50−55 −2%	50−55 +2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 −1.8%	110−120 +1.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	80−85 −1.2%	85−90 +1.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

60−65

−1.6%

65−70
+1.6%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 −2.1%	45−50 +2.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27 −4.2%	24−27 +4.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 −3.6%	27−30 +3.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 −1.4%	140−150 +1.4%
Hitman 3	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 −2%	50−55 +2%
Metro Exodus	45−50 −2.1%	45−50 +2.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	50−55 −1.9%	55−60 +1.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−33 −3.3%	30−35 +3.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	140−150 −1.4%	140−150 +1.4%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

40−45

−2.4%

40−45
+2.4%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 −4.2%	24−27 +4.2%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 −5.3%	20−22 +5.3%
Hitman 3	18−20 −5.3%	20−22 +5.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	120−130 −1.6%	120−130 +1.6%
Metro Exodus	27−30 −3.6%	27−30 +3.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 −7.7%	14−16 +7.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Far Cry 5	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−33 −3.3%	30−35 +3.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

21−24

−4.8%

21−24
+4.8%

This is how GTX 980M SLI and Quadro P4200 compete in popular games:

GTX 980M SLI is 4% faster in 900p
A tie in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Quadro P4200 is 8% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Quadro P4200 is ahead in 55 tests (76%)
there's a draw in 17 tests (24%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	24.61	25.17
Recency	7 October 2014	21 February 2018
Chip lithography	28 nm	16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	200 Watt	100 Watt

Quadro P4200 has a 2.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GTX 980M SLI and Quadro P4200.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 980M SLI is a notebook graphics card while Quadro P4200 is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.