Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS vs GeForce GTX 980

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 980 with Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, including specs and performance data.

GTX 980
2014
4 GB GDDR5, 165 Watt
28.79
+161%

GTX 980 outperforms Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS by a whopping 161% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking194422
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation10.95no data
Power efficiency12.1525.64
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)no data
GPU code nameGM204no data
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date19 September 2014 (10 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$549 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20481536
Core clock speed1064 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1216 MHz1250 MHz
Number of transistors5,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate155.6no data
Floating-point processing power4.981 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs128no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Recommended system power (PSU)500 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5LPDDR5x
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed7.0 GB/s8448 MHz
Memory bandwidth224 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2no data
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
VGA аnalog display support+no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support+no data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
G-SYNC support+-
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+-
GeForce ShadowPlay+-
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+-
Optimus+-
BatteryBoost+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.5no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.1.126-
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 980 28.79
+161%
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS 11.05

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 980 17605
+177%
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS 6346

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 980 12938
+106%
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS 6294

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 980 85374
+145%
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS 34890

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD93
+174%
34
−174%
1440p52
+206%
17
−206%
4K38
+171%
14−16
−171%

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.90no data
1440p10.56no data
4K14.45no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+167%
18−20
−167%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 69
+188%
24−27
−188%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50
+172%
18−20
−172%
Battlefield 5 86
+187%
30−33
−187%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 55−60
+181%
21−24
−181%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+167%
18−20
−167%
Far Cry 5 84
+180%
30−33
−180%
Far Cry New Dawn 77
+185%
27−30
−185%
Forza Horizon 4 253
+166%
95−100
−166%
Hitman 3 55−60
+181%
21−24
−181%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+187%
45−50
−187%
Metro Exodus 95−100
+180%
35−40
−180%
Red Dead Redemption 2 70−75
+170%
27−30
−170%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 130
+189%
45−50
−189%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+178%
40−45
−178%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 83
+177%
30−33
−177%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50
+172%
18−20
−172%
Battlefield 5 74
+174%
27−30
−174%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 55−60
+181%
21−24
−181%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+167%
18−20
−167%
Far Cry 5 69
+188%
24−27
−188%
Far Cry New Dawn 64
+167%
24−27
−167%
Forza Horizon 4 230
+171%
85−90
−171%
Hitman 3 55−60
+181%
21−24
−181%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+187%
45−50
−187%
Metro Exodus 95−100
+180%
35−40
−180%
Red Dead Redemption 2 70−75
+170%
27−30
−170%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 100−105
+186%
35−40
−186%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 132
+164%
50−55
−164%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+178%
40−45
−178%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35
+192%
12−14
−192%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50
+172%
18−20
−172%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 55−60
+181%
21−24
−181%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+167%
18−20
−167%
Far Cry 5 50
+178%
18−20
−178%
Forza Horizon 4 59
+181%
21−24
−181%
Hitman 3 55−60
+181%
21−24
−181%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+187%
45−50
−187%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 100−105
+186%
35−40
−186%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 46
+188%
16−18
−188%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+178%
40−45
−178%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 70−75
+170%
27−30
−170%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 47
+161%
18−20
−161%
Far Cry New Dawn 44
+175%
16−18
−175%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27
+170%
10−11
−170%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+190%
10−11
−190%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+175%
12−14
−175%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+186%
7−8
−186%
Far Cry 5 33
+175%
12−14
−175%
Forza Horizon 4 147
+167%
55−60
−167%
Hitman 3 35−40
+192%
12−14
−192%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
+186%
21−24
−186%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+162%
21−24
−162%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
+171%
24−27
−171%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+164%
14−16
−164%
Watch Dogs: Legion 150−160
+162%
60−65
−162%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+172%
18−20
−172%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 22
+175%
8−9
−175%
Far Cry New Dawn 24
+167%
9−10
−167%
Hitman 3 21−24
+188%
8−9
−188%
Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150
+164%
55−60
−164%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+183%
12−14
−183%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 29
+190%
10−11
−190%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14
+180%
5−6
−180%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+167%
6−7
−167%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+183%
6−7
−183%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Far Cry 5 16
+167%
6−7
−167%
Forza Horizon 4 34
+183%
12−14
−183%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+164%
14−16
−164%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
+225%
4−5
−225%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+178%
9−10
−178%

This is how GTX 980 and Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS compete in popular games:

  • GTX 980 is 174% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 980 is 206% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 980 is 171% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 28.79 11.05
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 30 Watt

GTX 980 has a 160.5% higher aggregate performance score.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, on the other hand, has a 600% more advanced lithography process, and 450% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 980 is our recommended choice as it beats the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 980 is a desktop card while Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
GeForce GTX 980
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 1445 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 980 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 10 votes

Rate Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.