GeForce 9300M GS vs GTX 980

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 980 with GeForce 9300M GS, including specs and performance data.

GTX 980
2014
4 GB GDDR5, 165 Watt
28.82
+10985%

GTX 980 outperforms 9300M GS by a whopping 10985% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1951354
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation10.97no data
Power efficiency11.971.37
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGM204G98
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date19 September 2014 (10 years ago)4 June 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$549 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20488
Core clock speed1064 MHz550 MHz
Boost clock speed1216 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,200 million210 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate155.64.400
Floating-point processing power4.981 TFLOPS0.0224 TFLOPS
Gigaflopsno data34
ROPs644
TMUs1288

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-I
Length267 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Recommended system power (PSU)500 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB256 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed7.0 GB/s700 MHz
Memory bandwidth224 GB/s11.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2No outputs
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
VGA аnalog display support+no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support+no data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
G-SYNC support+-
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+-
GeForce ShadowPlay+-
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+-
Optimus+-
BatteryBoost+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.44.0
OpenGL4.53.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 980 28.82
+10985%
9300M GS 0.26

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 980 11104
+11004%
9300M GS 100

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 980 37997
+14131%
9300M GS 267

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD930−1
1440p52-0−1
4K38-0−1

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.90no data
1440p10.56no data
4K14.45no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+2300%
2−3
−2300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 69
+2200%
3−4
−2200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50 0−1
Battlefield 5 86 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 55−60
+2850%
2−3
−2850%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+2300%
2−3
−2300%
Far Cry 5 84 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 77 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 253
+12550%
2−3
−12550%
Hitman 3 55−60
+1375%
4−5
−1375%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+1513%
8−9
−1513%
Metro Exodus 95−100 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 70−75 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 130
+3150%
4−5
−3150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+296%
27−30
−296%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 83
+2667%
3−4
−2667%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50 0−1
Battlefield 5 74 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 55−60
+2850%
2−3
−2850%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+2300%
2−3
−2300%
Far Cry 5 69 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 64 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 230
+11400%
2−3
−11400%
Hitman 3 55−60
+1375%
4−5
−1375%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+1513%
8−9
−1513%
Metro Exodus 95−100 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 70−75 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 100−105
+2400%
4−5
−2400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 132
+1367%
9−10
−1367%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+296%
27−30
−296%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35
+1067%
3−4
−1067%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 55−60
+2850%
2−3
−2850%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+2300%
2−3
−2300%
Far Cry 5 50 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 59 0−1
Hitman 3 55−60
+1375%
4−5
−1375%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+1513%
8−9
−1513%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 100−105
+2400%
4−5
−2400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 46
+411%
9−10
−411%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+296%
27−30
−296%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 70−75 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 47 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 44 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22 0−1
Far Cry 5 33 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 147
+14600%
1−2
−14600%
Hitman 3 35−40
+483%
6−7
−483%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
+2900%
2−3
−2900%
Metro Exodus 55−60 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 150−160
+15600%
1−2
−15600%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+2350%
2−3
−2350%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 22 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 24 0−1
Hitman 3 21−24 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150
+14400%
1−2
−14400%
Metro Exodus 30−35 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 29 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9 0−1
Far Cry 5 16 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 34 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+1150%
2−3
−1150%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 980 is 3150% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 980 surpassed 9300M GS in all 29 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 28.82 0.26
Recency 19 September 2014 4 June 2008
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 13 Watt

GTX 980 has a 10984.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.

9300M GS, on the other hand, has 1169.2% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 980 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9300M GS in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 980 is a desktop card while GeForce 9300M GS is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
GeForce GTX 980
NVIDIA GeForce 9300M GS
GeForce 9300M GS

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 1465 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 980 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 161 vote

Rate GeForce 9300M GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.