GeForce FX 5700 Ultra vs GTX 980 Ti

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking134not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation14.32no data
Power efficiency10.51no data
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameGM200NV36
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date2 June 2015 (9 years ago)23 October 2003 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$649 $199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2816no data
CUDA cores2816no data
Core clock speed1000 MHz475 MHz
Boost clock speed1075 MHzno data
Number of transistors8,000 million82 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt46 Watt
Texture fill rate189.41.900
Floating-point processing power6.06 TFLOPSno data
ROPs964
TMUs1764

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 8x
Length267 mm229 mm
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot1-slot
Recommended system power (PSU)600 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x Molex
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR2
Maximum RAM amount6 GB128 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed7.0 GB/s453 MHz
Memory bandwidth336.5 GB/s14.5 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.21x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
G-SYNC support+-
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+-
GeForce ShadowPlay+-
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0a
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.51.5 (2.1)
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 980 Ti 13809
+40515%
FX 5700 Ultra 34

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 June 2015 23 October 2003
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 46 Watt

GTX 980 Ti has an age advantage of 11 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

FX 5700 Ultra, on the other hand, has 443.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 980 Ti and GeForce FX 5700 Ultra. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700 Ultra
GeForce FX 5700 Ultra

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 1485 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 980 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 5 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5700 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.