CMP 30HX vs GeForce GTX 980 Ti

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 980 Ti with CMP 30HX, including specs and performance data.

GTX 980 Ti
2015
6 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
35.78
+69.7%

GTX 980 Ti outperforms CMP 30HX by an impressive 70% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking133255
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation14.2721.45
Power efficiency9.9111.68
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGM200TU116
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date2 June 2015 (9 years ago)25 February 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$649 $799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

CMP 30HX has 50% better value for money than GTX 980 Ti.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores28161408
Core clock speed1000 MHz1530 MHz
Boost clock speed1075 MHz1785 MHz
Number of transistors8,000 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt125 Watt
Texture fill rate189.4157.1
Floating-point processing power6.06 TFLOPS5.027 TFLOPS
ROPs9648
TMUs17688

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x4
Length267 mm229 mm
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot2-slot
Recommended system power (PSU)600 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB6 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed7.0 GB/s1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth336.5 GB/s336.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2No outputs
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
G-SYNC support+-
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+-
GeForce ShadowPlay+-
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.2
CUDA+7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 980 Ti 35.78
+69.7%
CMP 30HX 21.08

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 980 Ti 13808
+69.7%
CMP 30HX 8135

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GTX 980 Ti 42847
CMP 30HX 68128
+59%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD99
+80%
55−60
−80%
1440p49
+81.5%
27−30
−81.5%
4K53
+76.7%
30−35
−76.7%

Cost per frame, $

1080p6.5614.53
1440p13.2429.59
4K12.2526.63

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+77.1%
35−40
−77.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 75−80
+90%
40−45
−90%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
+77.1%
35−40
−77.1%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+78.5%
65−70
−78.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 70−75
+82.5%
40−45
−82.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+77.1%
35−40
−77.1%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+75.6%
45−50
−75.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 90−95
+80%
50−55
−80%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+82%
100−105
−82%
Hitman 3 75−80
+90%
40−45
−90%
Horizon Zero Dawn 150−160
+78.8%
85−90
−78.8%
Metro Exodus 110−120
+80%
65−70
−80%
Red Dead Redemption 2 85−90
+72%
50−55
−72%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 120−130
+72%
75−80
−72%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+75.7%
70−75
−75.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 75−80
+90%
40−45
−90%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
+77.1%
35−40
−77.1%
Battlefield 5 47
+74.1%
27−30
−74.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 70−75
+82.5%
40−45
−82.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+77.1%
35−40
−77.1%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+75.6%
45−50
−75.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 36
+71.4%
21−24
−71.4%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+82%
100−105
−82%
Hitman 3 75−80
+90%
40−45
−90%
Horizon Zero Dawn 150−160
+78.8%
85−90
−78.8%
Metro Exodus 49
+81.5%
27−30
−81.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 85−90
+72%
50−55
−72%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 120−130
+72%
75−80
−72%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 155
+72.2%
90−95
−72.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+75.7%
70−75
−75.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 46
+70.4%
27−30
−70.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
+77.1%
35−40
−77.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 70−75
+82.5%
40−45
−82.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+77.1%
35−40
−77.1%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+75.6%
45−50
−75.6%
Forza Horizon 4 72
+80%
40−45
−80%
Hitman 3 75−80
+90%
40−45
−90%
Horizon Zero Dawn 150−160
+78.8%
85−90
−78.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 120−130
+72%
75−80
−72%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 59
+96.7%
30−33
−96.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+75.7%
70−75
−75.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 85−90
+72%
50−55
−72%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+70%
40−45
−70%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
+83.3%
30−33
−83.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+81%
21−24
−81%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+85.7%
21−24
−85.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+75%
24−27
−75%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+92.9%
14−16
−92.9%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+70.8%
24−27
−70.8%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+70%
120−130
−70%
Hitman 3 45−50
+87.5%
24−27
−87.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
+71.1%
45−50
−71.1%
Metro Exodus 65−70
+91.4%
35−40
−91.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90
+70%
50−55
−70%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+85.2%
27−30
−85.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 180−190
+82%
100−105
−82%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+74.3%
35−40
−74.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30
+87.5%
16−18
−87.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 29
+81.3%
16−18
−81.3%
Hitman 3 27−30
+81.3%
16−18
−81.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 170−180
+71%
100−105
−71%
Metro Exodus 35
+94.4%
18−20
−94.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 44
+83.3%
24−27
−83.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18
+80%
10−11
−80%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+83.3%
12−14
−83.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+83.3%
12−14
−83.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+75%
12−14
−75%
Forza Horizon 4 42
+75%
24−27
−75%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
+77.8%
27−30
−77.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
+80%
10−11
−80%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+72.2%
18−20
−72.2%

This is how GTX 980 Ti and CMP 30HX compete in popular games:

  • GTX 980 Ti is 80% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 980 Ti is 81% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 980 Ti is 77% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 35.78 21.08
Recency 2 June 2015 25 February 2021
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 125 Watt

GTX 980 Ti has a 69.7% higher aggregate performance score.

CMP 30HX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 980 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the CMP 30HX in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 980 Ti is a desktop card while CMP 30HX is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
NVIDIA CMP 30HX
CMP 30HX

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 1497 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 980 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 27 votes

Rate CMP 30HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.