Quadro GP100 vs GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile

Place in performance ranking	109	92
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2018)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	N16E-GXX SLI	GP100
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	22 September 2015 (8 years ago)	1 October 2016 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	4096	3584
Core clock speed	1126 MHz	1304 MHz
Boost clock speed	1228 MHz	1442 MHz
Number of transistors	10400 Million	15,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	330 Watt	235 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	323.0
Floating-point performance	no data	10.34 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	no data	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 8-pin
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	HBM2
Maximum RAM amount	2x 8 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	4096 Bit
Memory clock speed	3500 MHz	1430 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	732.2 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	no data	1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort
G-SYNC support	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12_1	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	no data	6.4
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	1.2
Vulkan	-	1.2.131
CUDA	+	6.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	137 −2.2%	140−150 +2.2%
4K	67 −4.5%	70−75 +4.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

65−70

−2.9%

70−75
+2.9%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	80−85 −3.7%	85−90 +3.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	65−70 −4.5%	70−75 +4.5%
Battlefield 5	120−130 −4.8%	130−140 +4.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	75−80 −2.6%	80−85 +2.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	65−70 −2.9%	70−75 +2.9%
Far Cry 5	80−85 −7.1%	90−95 +7.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	95−100 −4.2%	100−105 +4.2%
Forza Horizon 4	190−200 −5.3%	200−210 +5.3%
Hitman 3	80−85 −3.7%	85−90 +3.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	160−170 −4.9%	170−180 +4.9%
Metro Exodus	120−130 −4.8%	130−140 +4.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	90−95 −4.4%	95−100 +4.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	140−150 −6.4%	150−160 +6.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	120−130 −1.6%	130−140 +1.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	80−85 −3.7%	85−90 +3.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	65−70 −4.5%	70−75 +4.5%
Battlefield 5	120−130 −4.8%	130−140 +4.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	75−80 −2.6%	80−85 +2.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	65−70 −2.9%	70−75 +2.9%
Far Cry 5	80−85 −7.1%	90−95 +7.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	95−100 −4.2%	100−105 +4.2%
Forza Horizon 4	190−200 −5.3%	200−210 +5.3%
Hitman 3	80−85 −3.7%	85−90 +3.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	160−170 −4.9%	170−180 +4.9%
Metro Exodus	120−130 −4.8%	130−140 +4.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	90−95 −4.4%	95−100 +4.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	140−150 −6.4%	150−160 +6.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	137 −2.2%	140−150 +2.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	120−130 −1.6%	130−140 +1.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	80−85 −3.7%	85−90 +3.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	65−70 −4.5%	70−75 +4.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	75−80 −2.6%	80−85 +2.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	65−70 −2.9%	70−75 +2.9%
Far Cry 5	80−85 −7.1%	90−95 +7.1%
Forza Horizon 4	190−200 −5.3%	200−210 +5.3%
Hitman 3	80−85 −3.7%	85−90 +3.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	160−170 −4.9%	170−180 +4.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	140−150 −6.4%	150−160 +6.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	74 −1.4%	75−80 +1.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	120−130 −1.6%	130−140 +1.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

90−95

−4.4%

95−100
+4.4%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	70−75 −1.4%	75−80 +1.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	55−60 −1.7%	60−65 +1.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 −7.1%	45−50 +7.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 −7.1%	45−50 +7.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	210−220 −6%	230−240 +6%
Hitman 3	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	80−85 −7.1%	90−95 +7.1%
Metro Exodus	70−75 −4.2%	75−80 +4.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	90−95 −7.5%	100−105 +7.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	55−60 −7.1%	60−65 +7.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	190−200 −5.3%	200−210 +5.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

65−70

−6.1%

70−75
+6.1%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 −2.6%	40−45 +2.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 +6.7%	30−33 −6.7%
Hitman 3	30−35 +3.3%	30−33 −3.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	180−190 −5.6%	190−200 +5.6%
Metro Exodus	45−50 −2%	50−55 +2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	51 +2%	50−55 −2%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 −3.8%	27−30 +3.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 +4.2%	24−27 −4.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +8.3%	12−14 −8.3%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −4.3%	24−27 +4.3%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 −1.9%	55−60 +1.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	50−55 −3.8%	55−60 +3.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 +5.6%	18−20 −5.6%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30−35

−2.9%

35−40
+2.9%

This is how GTX 980 SLI Mobile and Quadro GP100 compete in popular games:

Quadro GP100 is 2% faster in 1080p
Quadro GP100 is 4% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	39.44	42.45
Recency	22 September 2015	1 October 2016
Chip lithography	28 nm	16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	330 Watt	235 Watt

Quadro GP100 has a 7.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 40.4% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile and Quadro GP100.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile is a notebook card while Quadro GP100 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.