NVS 2100M vs GeForce GTX 970

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking200not rated
Place by popularity57not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation23.88no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)GT2xx (2009−2012)
GPU code nameGM204GT218
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date19 September 2014 (9 years ago)7 January 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$329 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores166416
Core clock speed1050 MHz535 MHz
Boost clock speed1178 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,200 million260 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)145 Watt11 Watt
Texture fill rate122.54.280
Floating-point performance3,920 gflops39.36 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 970 and NVS 2100M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3, DDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB512 MB
Memory bus width224 + 32 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed3500 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.4 GB/s12.64 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+no data
G-SYNC support+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.44.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+1.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 970 9641
+6836%
NVS 2100M 139

GeForce GTX 970 outperforms NVS 2100M by 6836% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 970 42263
+4160%
NVS 2100M 992

GeForce GTX 970 outperforms NVS 2100M by 4160% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 September 2014 7 January 2010
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 145 Watt 11 Watt

GTX 970 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

NVS 2100M, on the other hand, has 1218.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 970 and NVS 2100M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 970 is a desktop card while NVS 2100M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
GeForce GTX 970
NVIDIA NVS 2100M
NVS 2100M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 4427 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 970 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 7 votes

Rate NVS 2100M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.