Quadro 4000 vs GeForce GTX 965M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 965M with Quadro 4000, including specs and performance data.

GTX 965M
2016
2 GB GDDR5
9.83
+157%

GTX 965M outperforms 4000 by a whopping 157% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking451699
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.16
Power efficiency13.611.87
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGM206SGF100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date2016 (8 years ago)2 November 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024256
Core clock speed944 MHz475 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,940 million3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown142 Watt
Texture fill rate73.6015.20
Floating-point processing power2.355 TFLOPS0.4864 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs6432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2500 MHz702 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/s89.86 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
VGA аnalog display support+no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support+no data
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+-
GeForce ShadowPlay+-
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+-
Optimus+-
BatteryBoost+-
Ansel+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.75.1
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.11.1
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA+2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 965M 9.83
+157%
Quadro 4000 3.83

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 965M 3794
+157%
Quadro 4000 1478

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GTX 965M 14288
+184%
Quadro 4000 5034

Octane Render OctaneBench

This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.

GTX 965M 40
+90.5%
Quadro 4000 21

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD44
+175%
16−18
−175%
1440p21
+163%
8−9
−163%
4K19
+171%
7−8
−171%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data74.94
1440pno data149.88
4Kno data171.29

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+200%
5−6
−200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 31
+158%
12−14
−158%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+200%
5−6
−200%
Battlefield 5 49
+172%
18−20
−172%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+186%
7−8
−186%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+200%
5−6
−200%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+188%
8−9
−188%
Far Cry New Dawn 40
+186%
14−16
−186%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+171%
24−27
−171%
Hitman 3 18−20
+171%
7−8
−171%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+157%
21−24
−157%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+158%
12−14
−158%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45
+181%
16−18
−181%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 69
+188%
24−27
−188%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+163%
24−27
−163%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 41
+193%
14−16
−193%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+200%
5−6
−200%
Battlefield 5 37
+164%
14−16
−164%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+186%
7−8
−186%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+200%
5−6
−200%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+188%
8−9
−188%
Far Cry New Dawn 29
+190%
10−11
−190%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+171%
24−27
−171%
Hitman 3 18−20
+171%
7−8
−171%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+157%
21−24
−157%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+158%
12−14
−158%
Red Dead Redemption 2 33
+175%
12−14
−175%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+167%
12−14
−167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 86
+187%
30−33
−187%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+163%
24−27
−163%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 13
+160%
5−6
−160%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+200%
5−6
−200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+186%
7−8
−186%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+200%
5−6
−200%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+188%
8−9
−188%
Forza Horizon 4 28
+180%
10−11
−180%
Hitman 3 18−20
+171%
7−8
−171%
Horizon Zero Dawn 23
+188%
8−9
−188%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+167%
12−14
−167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18
+157%
7−8
−157%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+163%
24−27
−163%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 32
+167%
12−14
−167%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+171%
7−8
−171%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+200%
5−6
−200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10
+233%
3−4
−233%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+169%
16−18
−169%
Hitman 3 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18
+157%
7−8
−157%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+158%
24−27
−158%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21
+163%
8−9
−163%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Hitman 3 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+163%
16−18
−163%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
+160%
5−6
−160%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3
+200%
1−2
−200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 14
+180%
5−6
−180%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10
+233%
3−4
−233%

This is how GTX 965M and Quadro 4000 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 965M is 175% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 965M is 163% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 965M is 171% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.83 3.83
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm

GTX 965M has a 156.7% higher aggregate performance score, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 965M is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro 4000 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 965M is a notebook card while Quadro 4000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
GeForce GTX 965M
NVIDIA Quadro 4000
Quadro 4000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 107 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 965M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 181 vote

Rate Quadro 4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.