Quadro M2000 vs GeForce GTX 965M SLI

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 965M SLI with Quadro M2000, including specs and performance data.

GTX 965M SLI
2015
2x 4 GB GDDR5
17.36
+68.2%

GTX 965M SLI outperforms M2000 by an impressive 68% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking311440
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.44
Power efficiencyno data9.59
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameno dataGM206
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date5 January 2015 (9 years ago)8 April 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$437.75

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048768
Core clock speed924 MHz796 MHz
Boost clock speed950 MHz1163 MHz
Number of transistors2x 5200 Million2,940 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data75 Watt
Texture fill rateno data55.82
Floating-point processing powerno data1.786 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data201 mm
Widthno data1" (2.5 cm)
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5128 Bit
Maximum RAM amount2x 4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed5000 MHz1653 MHz
Memory bandwidthno dataUp to 106 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x DisplayPort
Number of simultaneous displaysno data4

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Vision Prono data+
Mosaicno data+
nView Desktop Managementno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.5
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.1.126
CUDA+5.2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD73
+82.5%
40−45
−82.5%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data10.94

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+68.8%
16−18
−68.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+85.7%
21−24
−85.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+81.3%
16−18
−81.3%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+90%
30−33
−90%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+94.4%
18−20
−94.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+68.8%
16−18
−68.8%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+90.5%
21−24
−90.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+74.1%
27−30
−74.1%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+69.2%
65−70
−69.2%
Hitman 3 30−35
+83.3%
18−20
−83.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
+72%
50−55
−72%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+68.6%
35−40
−68.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+74.1%
27−30
−74.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
+90%
30−33
−90%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+70%
50−55
−70%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+85.7%
21−24
−85.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+81.3%
16−18
−81.3%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+90%
30−33
−90%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+94.4%
18−20
−94.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+68.8%
16−18
−68.8%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+90.5%
21−24
−90.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+74.1%
27−30
−74.1%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+69.2%
65−70
−69.2%
Hitman 3 30−35
+83.3%
18−20
−83.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
+72%
50−55
−72%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+68.6%
35−40
−68.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+74.1%
27−30
−74.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
+90%
30−33
−90%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+90.5%
21−24
−90.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+70%
50−55
−70%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+85.7%
21−24
−85.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+81.3%
16−18
−81.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+94.4%
18−20
−94.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+68.8%
16−18
−68.8%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+90.5%
21−24
−90.5%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+69.2%
65−70
−69.2%
Hitman 3 30−35
+83.3%
18−20
−83.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
+72%
50−55
−72%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
+90%
30−33
−90%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+90.5%
21−24
−90.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+70%
50−55
−70%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+74.1%
27−30
−74.1%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+83.3%
18−20
−83.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+85.7%
14−16
−85.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+70%
10−11
−70%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+87.5%
8−9
−87.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+90%
10−11
−90%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+100%
10−11
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+70.9%
55−60
−70.9%
Hitman 3 20−22
+100%
10−11
−100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+94.4%
18−20
−94.4%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+72.2%
18−20
−72.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+83.3%
18−20
−83.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+90%
10−11
−90%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
+73.3%
60−65
−73.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+75%
16−18
−75%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+70%
10−11
−70%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
Hitman 3 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
+78%
50−55
−78%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+80%
10−11
−80%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+70%
10−11
−70%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+100%
5−6
−100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+91.7%
12−14
−91.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+80%
10−11
−80%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+87.5%
8−9
−87.5%

This is how GTX 965M SLI and Quadro M2000 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 965M SLI is 83% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.36 10.32
Recency 5 January 2015 8 April 2016

GTX 965M SLI has a 68.2% higher aggregate performance score.

Quadro M2000, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.

The GeForce GTX 965M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M2000 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 965M SLI is a notebook card while Quadro M2000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI
GeForce GTX 965M SLI
NVIDIA Quadro M2000
Quadro M2000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 965M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 202 votes

Rate Quadro M2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.