ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4570 vs GeForce GTX 960M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 960M and Mobility Radeon HD 4570, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 960M
2015
4 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
8.76
+2403%

GTX 960M outperforms ATI Mobility HD 4570 by a whopping 2403% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4921290
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.01no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameGM107M92
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date13 March 2015 (9 years ago)9 January 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64080
Core clock speed1096 MHz680 MHz
Boost clock speed1176 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,870 million242 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Wattno data
Texture fill rate47.045.440
Floating-point processing power1.505 TFLOPS0.1088 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs408

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)MXM-II
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed2500 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/s12.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
VGA аnalog display support+no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support+no data
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+-
GeForce ShadowPlay+-
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+-
Optimus+-
BatteryBoost+-
Ansel+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.14.1
OpenGL4.53.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p95
+3067%
3−4
−3067%
Full HD34
+3300%
1−2
−3300%
1440p150−1
4K140−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 25
+733%
3−4
−733%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14 0−1
Battlefield 5 30
+2900%
1−2
−2900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+800%
2−3
−800%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
Far Cry 5 28
+2700%
1−2
−2700%
Far Cry New Dawn 31
+3000%
1−2
−3000%
Forza Horizon 4 84
+2700%
3−4
−2700%
Hitman 3 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+525%
8−9
−525%
Metro Exodus 31
+3000%
1−2
−3000%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 48
+1100%
4−5
−1100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+111%
27−30
−111%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 31
+933%
3−4
−933%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14 0−1
Battlefield 5 23 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+800%
2−3
−800%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
Far Cry 5 24 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 23 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 71
+3450%
2−3
−3450%
Hitman 3 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+525%
8−9
−525%
Metro Exodus 26
+2500%
1−2
−2500%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+625%
4−5
−625%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 73
+711%
9−10
−711%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+111%
27−30
−111%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 11
+267%
3−4
−267%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+800%
2−3
−800%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
Far Cry 5 18 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 25 0−1
Hitman 3 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+525%
8−9
−525%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+625%
4−5
−625%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+111%
27−30
−111%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 15 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Far Cry 5 10 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 45
+4400%
1−2
−4400%
Hitman 3 12−14
+100%
6−7
−100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
+800%
2−3
−800%
Metro Exodus 15 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+2700%
2−3
−2700%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 7 0−1
Hitman 3 5−6 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+3400%
1−2
−3400%
Metro Exodus 8 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 4 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 10−12 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%

This is how GTX 960M and ATI Mobility HD 4570 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 960M is 3067% faster in 900p
  • GTX 960M is 3300% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 960M is 1100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 960M surpassed ATI Mobility HD 4570 in all 29 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.76 0.35
Recency 13 March 2015 9 January 2009
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 55 nm

GTX 960M has a 2402.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 96.4% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 960M is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 4570 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M
GeForce GTX 960M
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4570
Mobility Radeon HD 4570

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 1072 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 960M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 53 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 4570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.