Jetson AGX Xavier vs GeForce GTX 960A

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking487not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.06no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Volta (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGM107GV10B
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date13 March 2015 (9 years ago)October 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$899

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640512
Core clock speed1029 MHz854 MHz
Boost clock speed1085 MHz1377 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 million9,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate43.4044.06
Floating-point processing power1.389 TFLOPS1.41 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs4032
Tensor Coresno data64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)IGP
Lengthno data100 mm
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1253 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth80.19 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.2
CUDA5.07.2

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 30 Watt

Jetson AGX Xavier has a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 150% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 960A and Jetson AGX Xavier. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 960A is a notebook card while Jetson AGX Xavier is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A
GeForce GTX 960A
NVIDIA Jetson AGX Xavier
Jetson AGX Xavier

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 17 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 960A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 16 votes

Rate Jetson AGX Xavier on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.