Radeon R5 Graphics vs GeForce GTX 950A

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking573not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.16no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameGM107Spectre SL
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date13 March 2015 (9 years ago)17 September 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640256
Core clock speed993 MHz497 MHz
Boost clock speed1124 MHz720 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 million2,410 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate44.967.952
Floating-point processing power1.439 TFLOPS0.2545 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs4016

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)IGP
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1001 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth32.03 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.0
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA5.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 March 2015 17 September 2014
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 15 Watt

GTX 950A has an age advantage of 5 months.

R5 Graphics, on the other hand, has 400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 950A and Radeon R5 Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 950A is a notebook card while Radeon R5 Graphics is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A
GeForce GTX 950A
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
Radeon R5 Graphics

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 13 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 950A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 1580 votes

Rate Radeon R5 Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 950A or Radeon R5 Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.