Arc B580 vs GeForce GTX 880M

Place in the ranking	455	104
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	94.37
Power efficiency	5.63	14.67
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Xe2 (2025)
GPU code name	GK104	BMG-G21
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	12 March 2014 (10 years ago)	16 January 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$249

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1536	2560
Core clock speed	954 MHz	2670 MHz
Boost clock speed	993 MHz	2670 MHz
Number of transistors	3,540 million	19,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	122 Watt	190 Watt
Texture fill rate	127.1	427.2
Floating-point processing power	3.05 TFLOPS	13.67 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	80
TMUs	128	160
Tensor Cores	no data	160
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Bus support	PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0	no data
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	no data	272 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 8-pin
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	12 GB
Standard memory configuration	GDDR5	no data
Memory bus width	256 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	Up to 2500 MHz	2375 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s	456.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
eDP 1.2 signal support	Up to 3840x2160	no data
LVDS signal support	Up to 1920x1200	no data
VGA аnalog display support	Up to 2048x1536	no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support	Up to 3840x2160	no data
HDMI	+	+
HDCP content protection	+	-
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI	+	-
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder	+	-
Optimus	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.6
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	3.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.4
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 880M 9.98

Arc B580 40.48
+306%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 880M 3837

Arc B580 15556
+305%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	135 −270%	500−550 +270%
Full HD	56 −123%	125 +123%
1440p	16−18 −338%	70 +338%
4K	24 −75%	42 +75%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	1.99
1440p	no data	3.56
4K	no data	5.93

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	18−20 −653%	143 +653%
Cyberpunk 2077	20−22 −300%	80−85 +300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 −231%	100−110 +231%
Counter-Strike 2	18−20 −516%	117 +516%
Cyberpunk 2077	20−22 −300%	80−85 +300%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −300%	160−170 +300%
Forza Horizon 5	24−27 −312%	100−110 +312%
Metro Exodus	27−30 −256%	95−100 +256%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 −204%	75−80 +204%
Valorant	35−40 −326%	160−170 +326%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 −231%	100−110 +231%
Counter-Strike 2	18−20 −447%	104 +447%
Cyberpunk 2077	20−22 −300%	80−85 +300%
Dota 2	30 −367%	140 +367%
Far Cry 5	40−45 −68.3%	69 +68.3%
Fortnite	55−60 −202%	170−180 +202%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −300%	160−170 +300%
Forza Horizon 5	24−27 −312%	100−110 +312%
Grand Theft Auto V	45 −300%	180−190 +300%
Metro Exodus	27−30 −33.3%	36 +33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	75−80 −164%	200−210 +164%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 −204%	75−80 +204%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	38 −279%	140−150 +279%
Valorant	35−40 −326%	160−170 +326%
World of Tanks	140−150 −93.8%	270−280 +93.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 −231%	100−110 +231%
Counter-Strike 2	18−20 −400%	95 +400%
Cyberpunk 2077	20−22 −300%	80−85 +300%
Dota 2	35−40 −289%	140−150 +289%
Far Cry 5	40−45 −139%	95−100 +139%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −300%	160−170 +300%
Forza Horizon 5	24−27 −312%	100−110 +312%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	75−80 −164%	200−210 +164%
Valorant	35−40 −326%	160−170 +326%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	12−14 −431%	69 +431%
Grand Theft Auto V	12−14 −285%	50−55 +285%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	45−50 −296%	190−200 +296%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 −413%	40−45 +413%
World of Tanks	70−75 −256%	250−260 +256%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 −289%	70−75 +289%
Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −275%	30−33 +275%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 −275%	30−33 +275%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −495%	130−140 +495%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −286%	85−90 +286%
Forza Horizon 5	14−16 −353%	65−70 +353%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −358%	85−90 +358%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −285%	50−55 +285%
Valorant	24−27 −416%	120−130 +416%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −71.4%	24−27 +71.4%
Dota 2	20−22 −290%	78 +290%
Grand Theft Auto V	20−22 −300%	80−85 +300%
Metro Exodus	5−6 −820%	46 +820%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	27−30 −355%	130−140 +355%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −333%	24−27 +333%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20−22 −300%	80−85 +300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	9−10 −422%	45−50 +422%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 +0%	14 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −300%	12−14 +300%
Dota 2	20−22 −300%	80−85 +300%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −408%	60−65 +408%
Fortnite	10−11 −480%	55−60 +480%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −285%	50−55 +285%
Forza Horizon 5	7−8 −443%	35−40 +443%
Valorant	10−11 −580%	65−70 +580%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2

30−35

+0%

30−35

+0%

This is how GTX 880M and Arc B580 compete in popular games:

Arc B580 is 270% faster in 900p
Arc B580 is 123% faster in 1080p
Arc B580 is 338% faster in 1440p
Arc B580 is 75% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Arc B580 is 820% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Arc B580 is ahead in 43 tests (96%)
there's a draw in 2 tests (4%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	9.98	40.48
Recency	12 March 2014	16 January 2025
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	12 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	122 Watt	190 Watt

GTX 880M has 55.7% lower power consumption.

Arc B580, on the other hand, has a 305.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc B580 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 880M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 880M is a notebook card while Arc B580 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.