Quadro M1000M vs GeForce 945M

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 945M with Quadro M1000M, including specs and performance data.

GeForce 945M
2015
2 GB DDR3, 75 Watt
4.72

M1000M outperforms 945M by a substantial 35% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking624551
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data4.18
Power efficiency4.9912.65
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameGM107GM107
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date27 October 2015 (9 years ago)18 August 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$200.89

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640512
Core clock speed928 MHz993 MHz
Boost clock speed1020 MHz1072 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 million1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate40.8031.78
Floating-point processing power1.306 TFLOPS1.017 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs4032

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB/4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1253 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s80 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Display Portno data1.2

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost2.0no data
Optimus++
GameWorks+-
3D Vision Prono data+
Mosaicno data+
nView Display Managementno data+
Optimusno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.54.5
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.126+
CUDA+5.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce 945M 4.72
M1000M 6.38
+35.2%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 945M 2108
M1000M 2852
+35.3%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GeForce 945M 3310
M1000M 4230
+27.8%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GeForce 945M 2850
M1000M 3498
+22.7%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GeForce 945M 19405
M1000M 23422
+20.7%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GeForce 945M 8099
M1000M 8542
+5.5%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD27
−44.4%
39
+44.4%
4K9−10
−44.4%
13
+44.4%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data5.15
4Kno data15.45

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14
−41.7%
16−18
+41.7%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−54.5%
30−35
+54.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14
−41.7%
16−18
+41.7%
Battlefield 5 21−24
−42.9%
30−33
+42.9%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−54.5%
30−35
+54.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−46.7%
21−24
+46.7%
Fortnite 30−33
−40%
40−45
+40%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−34.8%
30−35
+34.8%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
−53.8%
20−22
+53.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
−25%
24−27
+25%
Valorant 60−65
−21%
75−80
+21%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14
−41.7%
16−18
+41.7%
Battlefield 5 21−24
−42.9%
30−33
+42.9%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−54.5%
30−35
+54.5%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 85−90
−28.7%
110−120
+28.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
Dota 2 40−45
−25.6%
50−55
+25.6%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−46.7%
21−24
+46.7%
Fortnite 30−33
−40%
40−45
+40%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−34.8%
30−35
+34.8%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
−53.8%
20−22
+53.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
−38.9%
24−27
+38.9%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−30%
12−14
+30%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
−25%
24−27
+25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 17
−11.8%
19
+11.8%
Valorant 60−65
−21%
75−80
+21%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−42.9%
30−33
+42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
Dota 2 40−45
−25.6%
50−55
+25.6%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−46.7%
21−24
+46.7%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−34.8%
30−35
+34.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
−25%
24−27
+25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9
−22.2%
11
+22.2%
Valorant 60−65
−21%
75−80
+21%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−33
−40%
40−45
+40%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−37.5%
10−12
+37.5%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
−35.9%
50−55
+35.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−11.4%
35−40
+11.4%
Valorant 55−60
−36.8%
75−80
+36.8%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−117%
12−14
+117%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−41.7%
16−18
+41.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−600%
7
+600%
Valorant 24−27
−38.5%
35−40
+38.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Dota 2 18−20
−38.9%
24−27
+38.9%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−57.1%
10−12
+57.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%

4K
High Preset

Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how GeForce 945M and M1000M compete in popular games:

  • M1000M is 44% faster in 1080p
  • M1000M is 44% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the M1000M is 600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • M1000M is ahead in 60 tests (98%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.72 6.38
Recency 27 October 2015 18 August 2015
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 40 Watt

GeForce 945M has an age advantage of 2 months.

M1000M, on the other hand, has a 35.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 87.5% lower power consumption.

The Quadro M1000M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 945M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 945M is a notebook graphics card while Quadro M1000M is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 945M
GeForce 945M
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
Quadro M1000M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 11 votes

Rate GeForce 945M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 582 votes

Rate Quadro M1000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 945M or Quadro M1000M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.