Radeon RX 6400 vs GeForce GTX 850M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 850M with Radeon RX 6400, including specs and performance data.

GTX 850M
2014
2 GB DDR3, 45 Watt
6.52

RX 6400 outperforms GTX 850M by a whopping 202% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking566277
Place by popularitynot in top-100100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data53.23
Power efficiency10.0325.70
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGM107Navi 24
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date12 March 2014 (10 years ago)19 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$159

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640768
Core clock speedUp to 936 MHz1923 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2321 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 million5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt53 Watt
Texture fill rate36.08111.4
Floating-point processing power1.155 TFLOPS3.565 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs4048
Ray Tracing Coresno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Standard memory configurationDDR3 or GDDR5no data
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speedUp to 2500 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth80.0 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
eDP 1.2 signal supportUp to 3840x2160no data
LVDS signal supportUp to 1920x1200no data
VGA аnalog display supportUp to 2048x1536no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportUp to 3840x2160no data
HDMI++
HDCP content protection+-
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI+-
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+-
Optimus+-
Ansel+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.12.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 850M 6.52
RX 6400 19.67
+202%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 850M 2516
RX 6400 7591
+202%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p84
−198%
250−260
+198%
Full HD31
−190%
90−95
+190%
4K10
−200%
30−35
+200%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data1.77
4Kno data5.30

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−200%
30−33
+200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−194%
50−55
+194%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−200%
24−27
+200%
Battlefield 5 18−20
−178%
50−55
+178%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−186%
40−45
+186%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−200%
30−33
+200%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−186%
40−45
+186%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−178%
50−55
+178%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−179%
120−130
+179%
Hitman 3 12−14
−169%
35−40
+169%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−182%
110−120
+182%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−178%
50−55
+178%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
−178%
50−55
+178%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−195%
65−70
+195%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−188%
150−160
+188%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−194%
50−55
+194%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−200%
24−27
+200%
Battlefield 5 18−20
−178%
50−55
+178%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−186%
40−45
+186%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−200%
30−33
+200%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−186%
40−45
+186%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−178%
50−55
+178%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−179%
120−130
+179%
Hitman 3 12−14
−169%
35−40
+169%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−182%
110−120
+182%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−178%
50−55
+178%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
−178%
50−55
+178%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−195%
65−70
+195%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 58
−193%
170−180
+193%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−188%
150−160
+188%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−194%
50−55
+194%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−200%
24−27
+200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−186%
40−45
+186%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−200%
30−33
+200%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−186%
40−45
+186%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−179%
120−130
+179%
Hitman 3 12−14
−169%
35−40
+169%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−182%
110−120
+182%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−195%
65−70
+195%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 11
−173%
30−33
+173%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−188%
150−160
+188%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
−178%
50−55
+178%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−192%
35−40
+192%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
−200%
30−33
+200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−200%
21−24
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−186%
60−65
+186%
Hitman 3 10−11
−200%
30−33
+200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−186%
40−45
+186%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−193%
120−130
+193%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−173%
30−33
+173%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
Hitman 3 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−178%
50−55
+178%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−200%
21−24
+200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−200%
21−24
+200%

This is how GTX 850M and RX 6400 compete in popular games:

  • RX 6400 is 198% faster in 900p
  • RX 6400 is 190% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6400 is 200% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.52 19.67
Recency 12 March 2014 19 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 53 Watt

GTX 850M has 17.8% lower power consumption.

RX 6400, on the other hand, has a 201.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6400 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 850M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 850M is a notebook card while Radeon RX 6400 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
GeForce GTX 850M
AMD Radeon RX 6400
Radeon RX 6400

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 524 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 850M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 1865 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.