Quadro FX 350M vs GeForce GTX 850M

Place in the ranking	573	1443
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	10.03	0.51
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2017)	Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code name	GM107	G72
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	12 March 2014 (10 years ago)	13 March 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	7
Core clock speed	Up to 936 MHz	450 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	450 MHz
Number of transistors	1,870 million	112 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	45 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	36.08	1.800
Floating-point processing power	1.155 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	16	2
TMUs	40	4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Bus support	PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 1.0 x16
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	256 MB
Standard memory configuration	DDR3 or GDDR5	no data
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	Up to 2500 MHz	450 MHz
Memory bandwidth	80.0 GB/s	14.4 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
eDP 1.2 signal support	Up to 3840x2160	no data
LVDS signal support	Up to 1920x1200	no data
VGA аnalog display support	Up to 2048x1536	no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support	Up to 3840x2160	no data
HDMI	+	-
HDCP content protection	+	-
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI	+	-
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder	+	-
Optimus	+	-
Ansel	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model	5.1	3.0
OpenGL	4.5	2.1
OpenCL	1.1	N/A
Vulkan	1.1.126	N/A
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 850M 6.54
+5845%

FX 350M 0.11

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 850M 2516
+5618%

FX 350M 44

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	84 +8300%	1−2 −8300%
Full HD	32	0−1
4K	10	-0−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	14−16 +75%	8−9 −75%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +1200%	1−2 −1200%
Elden Ring	16−18	0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 +75%	8−9 −75%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +1200%	1−2 −1200%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 +420%	5−6 −420%
Metro Exodus	16−18	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 +375%	4−5 −375%
Valorant	20−22	0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 +75%	8−9 −75%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +1200%	1−2 −1200%
Dota 2	13	0−1
Elden Ring	16−18	0−1
Far Cry 5	30−33 +400%	6−7 −400%
Fortnite	35−40	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 +420%	5−6 −420%
Grand Theft Auto V	20	0−1
Metro Exodus	16−18	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	50−55 +980%	5−6 −980%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 +375%	4−5 −375%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12 +200%	4−5 −200%
Valorant	20−22	0−1
World of Tanks	99 +890%	10−11 −890%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 +75%	8−9 −75%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +1200%	1−2 −1200%
Dota 2	21−24	0−1
Far Cry 5	30−33 +400%	6−7 −400%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 +420%	5−6 −420%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	50−55 +980%	5−6 −980%
Valorant	20−22	0−1

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	6−7	0−1
Elden Ring	8−9	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	7−8	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 +3700%	1−2 −3700%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6	0−1
World of Tanks	45−50	0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	10−12	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Far Cry 5	14−16 +250%	4−5 −250%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14	0−1
Metro Exodus	9−10	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 +700%	1−2 −700%
Valorant	16−18 +325%	4−5 −325%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	0−1	0−1
Dota 2	18−20 +20%	14−16 −20%
Elden Ring	3−4	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 +13.3%	14−16 −13.3%
Metro Exodus	2−3	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	18−20	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 +13.3%	14−16 −13.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	5−6	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	0−1	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Dota 2	18−20 +20%	14−16 −20%
Far Cry 5	8−9	0−1
Fortnite	6−7	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	6−7	0−1
Valorant	6−7	0−1

This is how GTX 850M and FX 350M compete in popular games:

GTX 850M is 8300% faster in 900p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 850M is 3700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

GTX 850M is ahead in 29 tests (97%)
there's a draw in 1 test (3%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	6.54	0.11
Recency	12 March 2014	13 March 2006
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	256 MB
Chip lithography	28 nm	90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	45 Watt	15 Watt

GTX 850M has a 5845.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

FX 350M, on the other hand, has 200% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 850M is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 350M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 850M is a notebook graphics card while Quadro FX 350M is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.