Iris Xe Graphics 96EU Mobile vs GeForce GTX 850A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking806not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)Generation 12.2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameGM107Raptor Lake GT1
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date17 March 2014 (10 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640768
Core clock speed902 MHzno data
Boost clock speed936 MHz1500 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate37.4472.00
Floating-point performance1.198 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16Ring Bus
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1800 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA5.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 March 2014 4 January 2023
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 15 Watt

Iris Xe Graphics 96EU Mobile has an age advantage of 8 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 850A and Iris Xe Graphics 96EU Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 850A is a desktop card while Iris Xe Graphics 96EU Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850A
GeForce GTX 850A
Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU Mobile
Iris Xe Graphics 96EU Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 3 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 850A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 17 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics 96EU Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.