Quadro M1200 vs GeForce GTX 780M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 780M with Quadro M1200, including specs and performance data.

GTX 780M
2013
4 GB GDDR5, 122 Watt
9.96
+19.1%

GTX 780M outperforms Quadro M1200 by a moderate 19% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking418474
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.410.89
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Maxwell (2014−2018)
GPU code nameN14E-GTXN17P-Q1
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date30 May 2013 (11 years ago)13 January 2017 (7 years ago)
Current price$1093 $1372

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 780M has 58% better value for money than Quadro M1200.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536640
CUDA cores1536no data
Core clock speed823 MHz991 MHz
Boost clock speed797 MHz1150 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million1870 Million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)122 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate102.043.72
Floating-point performance2,448 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 780M and Quadro M1200 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargelarge
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Standard memory configurationGDDR5no data
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2500 MHz5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s80 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
eDP 1.2 signal supportUp to 3840x2160no data
LVDS signal supportUp to 1920x1200no data
VGA аnalog display supportUp to 2048x1536no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportUp to 3840x2160no data
HDMI+no data
HDCP content protection+no data
Display Portno data1.2
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI+no data
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming+no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support+no data
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+no data
Optimus++
3D Vision / 3DTV Play+no data
3D Stereono data+
Mosaicno data+
nView Display Managementno data+
Optimusno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.54.5
OpenCL1.11.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.1.126
CUDA+5.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 780M 9.96
+19.1%
Quadro M1200 8.36

GeForce GTX 780M outperforms Quadro M1200 by 19% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 780M 3847
+19.1%
Quadro M1200 3229

GeForce GTX 780M outperforms Quadro M1200 by 19% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 780M 7777
+46.5%
Quadro M1200 5310

GeForce GTX 780M outperforms Quadro M1200 by 46% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 780M 5244
+26.6%
Quadro M1200 4142

GeForce GTX 780M outperforms Quadro M1200 by 27% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 780M 35965
+30.5%
Quadro M1200 27557

GeForce GTX 780M outperforms Quadro M1200 by 31% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

GTX 780M 12571
+29.2%
Quadro M1200 9730

GeForce GTX 780M outperforms Quadro M1200 by 29% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 5%

GTX 780M 11788
+24.5%
Quadro M1200 9471

GeForce GTX 780M outperforms Quadro M1200 by 24% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan.

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

GTX 780M 9535
Quadro M1200 10296
+8%

Quadro M1200 outperforms GeForce GTX 780M by 8% in GeekBench 5 CUDA.

Unigine Heaven 3.0

This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

GTX 780M 76
+152%
Quadro M1200 30

GeForce GTX 780M outperforms Quadro M1200 by 152% in Unigine Heaven 3.0.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD71
+145%
29
−145%
4K14−16
+16.7%
12
−16.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14−16 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16 no data
Battlefield 5 30−35 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16 no data
Far Cry 5 21−24 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30 no data
Forza Horizon 4 45−50 no data
Hitman 3 18−20 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45 no data
Metro Exodus 30−35 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16 no data
Battlefield 5 30−35 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16 no data
Far Cry 5 21−24 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30 no data
Forza Horizon 4 45−50 no data
Hitman 3 18−20 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45 no data
Metro Exodus 30−35 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16 no data
Far Cry 5 21−24 no data
Forza Horizon 4 45−50 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 17 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30 no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 no data
Far Cry 5 16−18 no data
Forza Horizon 4 18−20 no data
Hitman 3 12−14 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24 no data
Metro Exodus 14−16 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18 no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8 no data
Hitman 3 6−7 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Far Cry 5 5−6 no data
Forza Horizon 4 12−14 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11 no data
Metro Exodus 10−11 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10 no data

This is how GTX 780M and Quadro M1200 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 780M is 145% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 780M is 17% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.96 8.36
Recency 30 May 2013 13 January 2017
Power consumption (TDP) 122 Watt 45 Watt

The GeForce GTX 780M is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M1200 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 780M is a notebook graphics card while Quadro M1200 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
GeForce GTX 780M
NVIDIA Quadro M1200
Quadro M1200

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 106 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 780M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 288 votes

Rate Quadro M1200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.