ATI Radeon 9600 PRO vs GeForce GTX 780M SLI

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking284not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.75no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Rage 8 (2002−2007)
GPU code nameN14E-GTXRV350
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date30 May 2013 (11 years ago)1 October 2003 (21 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3072no data
Core clock speed823 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors7080 Million60 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rateno data1.600
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount2x 4 GB128 MB
Memory bus width2x 256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed5000 MHz300 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data9.6 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX119.0 (9_0)
OpenGLno data2.0
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 May 2013 1 October 2003
Chip lithography 28 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 18 Watt

GTX 780M SLI has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9600 PRO, on the other hand, has 1011.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 780M SLI and Radeon 9600 PRO. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 780M SLI is a notebook card while Radeon 9600 PRO is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M SLI
GeForce GTX 780M SLI
ATI Radeon 9600 PRO
Radeon 9600 PRO

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 5 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 780M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 70 votes

Rate Radeon 9600 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.