GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile vs GTX 780

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 780 with GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

GTX 780
2013
3 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
20.75
+12.5%

GTX 780 outperforms GTX 1650 Mobile by a moderate 13% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking260295
Place by popularitynot in top-10071
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.75no data
Power efficiency5.9926.61
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGK110TU117
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date23 May 2013 (11 years ago)15 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$649 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23041024
Core clock speed863 MHz1380 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHz1560 MHz
Number of transistors7,080 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt50 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature95 °Cno data
Texture fill rate173.299.84
Floating-point processing power4.156 TFLOPS3.195 TFLOPS
ROPs4832
TMUs19264

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Minimum recommended system power600 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount3 GB4 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.4 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPortNo outputs
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D+-
3D Gaming+-
3D Vision+-
PhysX+-
3D Vision Live+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.140
CUDA+7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 780 20.75
+12.5%
GTX 1650 Mobile 18.44

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 780 8005
+12.5%
GTX 1650 Mobile 7116

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 780 10460
+12.3%
GTX 1650 Mobile 9313

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD54
−5.6%
57
+5.6%
1440p40−45
+11.1%
36
−11.1%
4K27−30
+12.5%
24
−12.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 52
+0%
52
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55
+0%
55
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 42
+0%
42
+0%
Battlefield 5 81
+0%
81
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 51
+0%
51
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 41
+0%
41
+0%
Far Cry 5 66
+0%
66
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 79
+0%
79
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 166
+0%
166
+0%
Hitman 3 47
+0%
47
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 164
+0%
164
+0%
Metro Exodus 82
+0%
82
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 71
+0%
71
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 117
+0%
117
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 146
+0%
146
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 80
+0%
80
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24
+0%
24
+0%
Battlefield 5 70
+0%
70
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 47
+0%
47
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 32
+0%
32
+0%
Far Cry 5 53
+0%
53
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 54
+0%
54
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 148
+0%
148
+0%
Hitman 3 42
+0%
42
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 148
+0%
148
+0%
Metro Exodus 68
+0%
68
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55
+0%
55
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 64
+0%
64
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 141
+0%
141
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30
+0%
30
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8
+0%
8
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 34
+0%
34
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30
+0%
30
+0%
Far Cry 5 40
+0%
40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 62
+0%
62
+0%
Hitman 3 37
+0%
37
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 57
+0%
57
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55
+0%
55
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 36
+0%
36
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 17
+0%
17
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 52
+0%
52
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 43
+0%
43
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 34
+0%
34
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 22
+0%
22
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 15
+0%
15
+0%
Far Cry 5 25
+0%
25
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 99
+0%
99
+0%
Hitman 3 26
+0%
26
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 44
+0%
44
+0%
Metro Exodus 39
+0%
39
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 115
+0%
115
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 33
+0%
33
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21
+0%
21
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 17
+0%
17
+0%
Hitman 3 14
+0%
14
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45
+0%
45
+0%
Metro Exodus 26
+0%
26
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21
+0%
21
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12
+0%
12
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5
+0%
5
+0%
Far Cry 5 12
+0%
12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 17
+0%
17
+0%

This is how GTX 780 and GTX 1650 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1650 Mobile is 6% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 780 is 11% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 780 is 13% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 72 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.75 18.44
Recency 23 May 2013 15 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 50 Watt

GTX 780 has a 12.5% higher aggregate performance score.

GTX 1650 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 780 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 780 is a desktop card while GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
GeForce GTX 780
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1029 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 780 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 3188 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.